Effects of Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skill Model-based continuing care on stroke patients after thrombolytic therapy
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2019.16.001
- VernacularTitle: 基于信息-动机-行为技巧模型的延续护理在脑卒中溶栓患者中的应用
- Author:
Ping WANG
1
;
Jing PEI
;
Xiangfeng KONG
;
Haixia CHANG
;
Hua GAO
;
Yuxia QI
;
Biguli RE
;
Lin DU
;
Lijuan ZHANG
Author Information
1. Department of Neurology, the Fifth Hospital Affiliated of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830011, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Quality of life;
Stroke;
Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skill Model;
Continuing care;
Thrombolysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2019;35(16):1201-1206
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the application value of Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skill Model (IMB)-based continuing care on the recovery of nerve function and life quality in patients with stroke after thrombolytic therapy.
Methods:Stroke patients who underwent thrombolytic therapy were randomly assigned to IMB group(35 cases) and control group(35 cases) according to the method of random number table. The control group recieved routine thrombolysis nursing, IMB group was given IMB-based continuing care. After six months of intervention, nerve function was evaluated by National Institute of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS) and Modified Rankin Scale(MRS), the active ability was performed by Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale(FMA) and Barthel Index(BI), the quality of life was assessed by the item short from health survey(SF-36), respectively.
Results:Before intervention, the scores of NIHSS, MRS, FMA, BI, SF-36 between two groups was no significant difference (P>0.05). After three and six months of nursing, the NIHSS, MRS was (7.84±2.20), (5.00±1.60) points and (3.48±0.84), (3.07±0.69) points in IMB group, and (9.75±1.82), (8.21±1.37) points and (4.06±1.08), (3.91±0.71) points in control group, there was significant difference between two groups (t =2.417-8.647, P<0.01 or 0.05). After one, three and six months of intervention, FMA was (65.86±5.67), (76.41±8.47), (78.79±8.58) points, BI was (46.29±7.29), (58.09±10.20), (67.50±9.44) points, SF-36 was (33.13±4.64), (43.09±6.70), (49.83±8.56) points in IMB group, (58.53±8.92), (64.47±7.56), (71.81±8.90) points, (42.47±5.67), (48.74±5.39), (56.03±6.55) points and (29.63±4.06), (35.91±5.93), (41.02±9.05) points in control group, there was significant difference between two groups (t =2.333-5.972, P< 0.05). Moreover, in the repeated measures ANOVA showed the differences of NIHSS, MRS, FMA, BI, SF-36 were statistically significant for the group by time interaction(F=13.556-133.994, P<0.05).
Conclusions:IMB-based continuing care can promotes the recovery of nerve function and improves the quality of life in patients with stroke after thrombolytic therapy.
