Comparison of efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery for gallstones and common bile duct stones
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2019.11.006
- VernacularTitle: 腹腔镜下不同手术方式治疗胆囊结石及胆总管结石的临床效果比较
- Author:
Jikai HE
1
;
Jinliang DONG
;
Weizhong ZHANG
;
Yeying CHU
;
Shengzhen PENG
;
Jinrong LIANG
Author Information
1. Department of General Surgery, Zhoushan Hospital, Zhoushan, Zhejiang 316000, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Laparoscopic;
Gallstones;
Common bile duct stones;
Surgical methods;
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy;
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration;
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic sphincterotomy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2019;26(11):1301-1304
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of gallstones and common bile duct stones.
Methods:Eighty-seven patients with gallstones complicated with common bile duct stones who underwent concurrent laparoscopic surgery at Zhoushan Hospital from December 2015 to December 2017 were enrolled.The patients were divided into A group and B group according to the digital table.A group(38 cases) underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE), and B group(49 cases) underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The curative effect of the two groups was observed.The operation time, the success rate of the operation and the rate of laparotomy were recorded in the two groups.The corresponding hospitalization time and cost were compared.The safety of the two different procedures was compared after surgery, and the complications of the two groups were recorded.
Results:In A group, the average diameter of common bile duct stones was (1.02±0.25)cm, the average diameter of common bile duct diameter was (1.15±0.25)cm.In B group, the mean diameter of common bile duct stones was (0.99±0.26)cm, and the average diameter of common bile duct was (1.13±0.26) cm.The differences between the two groups were not statistically significant (t=0.513, 0.437, 0.367, P=2.083, 1.533, 1.095). The successful operation rate of A group was 92.11%(35/38), which in B group was 91.84%(45/49), the difference was not statistically significant between the two groups(χ2=0.006, P=0.974). The incidence rate of complications in B group was 20.41%, which was significantly higher than that in A group, the difference was statistically significant(χ2=3.654, P=0.019). The hospitalization time, hospitalization expenses in A group were (10.6±2.6)d, (26 649.8±3 478.6)CNY, respectively, which were significantly better than those in B group (t=21.971, 17.168, all P<0.05).
Conclusion:The efficacy of LC combined with LCBDE for patients with gallstones complicated with common bile duct stones is better than ERCP/EST combined with LC surgery, and the safety of the former is higher than the latter.
