The value of space glucose control in ICU stress hyperglycemia management
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2019.11.012
- VernacularTitle: 适集思血糖控制在ICU应激性高血糖管理中的价值
- Author:
Juan LU
1
;
Pengcheng LIU
;
Lijun LIU
;
Jianjun ZHU
;
Baochun ZHOU
;
Yan ZHU
;
Jingye ZHAN
;
Qunying BAO
;
Xiaoyan TIAN
Author Information
1. Department of Emergency, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China
- Publication Type:Clinical Trail
- Keywords:
SGC;
ICU patients;
Stress hyperglycemia;
Blood glucose management
- From:
Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
2019;28(11):1395-1399
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effect of space glucose control (SGC) on the quality of blood glucose management in ICU patients with stress hyperglycemia.
Methods:A prospective, cross-controlled, quasi-trial was conducted to observe patients with ICU-induced stress hyperglycemia between January 2018 and January 2019. Patients with conventional blood glucose management served as the control group, and SGC blood glucose management was used as the intervention group. The enrolled patients were interchanged between the two groups every 24 h, and the end point was 96 h. The differences in blood glucose management quality indicators between the two groups were compared, including the average blood glucose level, the highest and lowest blood glucose level, the average blood glucose monitoring interval, and the accumulated insulin dosage. SPSS 23.0 was used to analyze the data. The paired t test was used for the normal distributed data. Otherwise, two nonparametric correlation sample tests was used. A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results:A total of 41 patients enrolled in this study during the study period. The average blood glucose value in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group [(8.60 ±1.42)mmol/L vs (10.02 ±1.49)mmol/L, P< 0.01]. The frequency of hyperglycemia was lower than that of the control group (16.59 ±8.56 vs 18.73 ±7.91, P=0.023). The frequency of blood glucose value in the target blood glucose range was significantly higher than that of the control group (53.07±19.11 vs 29.44±19.60, P< 0.01). However, the frequency of hypoglycemia, the frequency of blood glucose monitoring and the accumulated insulin dosage in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group [1 (0, 5) vs 0 (0, 2), P< 0 01; 1 36 ±0 23 vs 1 89 ±0 28, P< 0.01; and (139.61 ±77.06)U vs (107.49 ±64.41)U, P<0.01].
Conclusions:SGC can optimize the control of blood glucose in the target blood glucose range, but it can easily lead to mild hypoglycemia, and to a certain extent increases the workload of medical staff.
