Final examination paper analysis of Surgery and Field Surgery in five-year students from comprehensive class of Grade 2014
10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2019.11.021
- VernacularTitle: 2014级五年制三教班外科学及野战外科学期末试卷分析
- Author:
Min YAN
1
;
Bangke ZHANG
2
;
Liang WANG
3
;
Liang TANG
4
;
Jingchuan SUN
2
;
Lei LIANG
2
;
Feng LENG
5
;
Zhinong WANG
1
;
Hongliang SHEN
1
Author Information
1. Teaching and Research Section of Surgery and Field Surgery, The Affiliated Changzheng Hospital of Navy Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China
2. Department of Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Changzheng Hospital of Navy Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China
3. Department of Bone Trauma, The Affiliated Changzheng Hospital of Navy Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China
4. Department of The Fourth General Surgery, The Affiliated Changzheng Hospital of Navy Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China
5. Section of Medical Services (Academic Affairs), The Affiliated Changzheng Hospital of Navy Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Examination paper analysis;
Surgery and Field Surgery;
Teaching effect;
Comprehensive class
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2019;18(11):1168-1172
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze the quality of final exam papers of Surgery and Field Surgery for five-year medical students from comprehensive class of Grade 2014, so as to check the mastery of different students, perfect the construction of item banking, verify the quality of teaching and learning, and thus provide references to further teaching reform.
Methods:SPSS 21.0 was used for statistical analysis of 133 Surgery and Field Surgery papers of students from comprehensive class of Grade 2014.
Results:The highest score was 93.5, the lowest score was 52.0, and the average score was (70.60±9.00). Among those 133 students, six students were failed, occupying 4.51%. The overall difficulty coefficient of examination paper (P) was 0.71, and P value of multiple choice questions and blank-filling questions was 0.4-0.7. Difference degrees (D) of question types were more than 0.600 and the overall reliability was 0.764. Scores of examination paper were generally in normal distribution. The average scores of students form anesthesiology major were higher than those of students from navigation medicine major, but the average scores of students from above two majors were higher than those of students from psychology major, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05).
Conclusion:Question types of this paper are comprehensive and reasonable. The overall difficulty is not high, the difference degree is good, the reliability is good and the score distribution is reasonable. However, the question should be further improved, focusing on the reasonable distribution of difficulty of question. In addition, we should strengthen the teaching of the course in students from psychology major.
