Application of three methods in occupational health risk assessment of automobile 4S shop
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9391.2019.11.018
- VernacularTitle: 三种风险评估方法在某汽车4S店职业健康风险评估中的应用
- Author:
Lin CHEN
1
;
Zibo CEN
1
;
Weiyu MA
1
;
Yali JIN
1
;
Youmei SHU
1
;
Yimin LIU
1
;
Xudong LI
2
Author Information
1. Guangzhou Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment Center, Guangzhou 510620, China
2. Guangdong Province Hospital for Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment, Guangzhou 510300, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Risk assessment;
Work classification;
automobile 4S store
- From:
Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases
2019;37(11):866-870
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To choose various occupational health risk assessment of the mature methods at home and abroad respectively occupational health risk assessment was carried out on the 4s stores, to explore different risk assessment methods on the 4 s shop the applicability of the occupational health risk assessment.
Methods:Chemical was applied on the harmful factors of occupational health risk assessment technology guideline in the composite index method, quantitative cancer risk assessment method using the guidelines for the harmful factors of occupational health risk assessment of chemical technology of composite index method, quantitative cancer risk assessment method, international commission on mining and metals (ICMM) occupational health risk assessment quantitative method and the occupational-disease-inductive operation classification to evaluate chemical factors in 4S store, Combined with on-site occupational health investigation to compare with the result of risk assessment and analysis of international mining and metals (ICMM) committee occupational health risk assessment quantitative method and the occupational-disease-inductive operation classification of 4S store to evaluate chemical factors, combined with on-site occupational health investigation comparison and analysis the result of the risk assessment.
Results:Except for 6 times, the results of ICMM matrix method and comprehensive index method were consistent, which were all higher than job classification. The other results were job classification of >of ICMM matrix method >comprehensive index method or job classification of >of ICMM matrix method.
Conclusion:When the concentration of occupational-disease-inductive factors is lower than 1/2 limit, the risk assessment results tend to be ICMM quantitative >composite index method >operation classification. When the occupational-disease-inductive factors were involved with triphenyl, the quantitative non-carcinogenic risk assessment method was more likely to reach the conclusion that the occupational health risk was unacceptable.
