Effect of health management based on protection motivation theory on the outcome of stroke patients
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2020.06.003
- VernacularTitle: 基于保护动机理论的健康管理对脑卒中患者效果的影响
- Author:
Caixia YANG
1
;
Yanjin LIU
1
;
Yuanli GUO
1
;
Xiaofang DONG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Protection motivation theory;
Health management;
Stroke;
Fatigue;
Neurological function;
Living ability
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2020;36(6):411-414
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effects of health management based on the theory of protection motivation on fatigue status, neurological function recovery and life ability of stroke patients, and evaluate its clinical effects.
Methods:A total of 120 stroke patients admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2018 to January 2019 were selected as subjects. Randomized digital table method was used to divided them into observation group and control group, 60 cases in each group; the control group underwent routine nursing and follow-up of neurology, and the observation group was given health management based on protection motivation theory on the basis of the control group. The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) was used to assess the patient's fatigue, the European Stroke Scale (ESS) was used to evaluate the patient's neurological function, the modified Barthel index was used to assess the patient's viability. The fatigue, neurological recovery, and changes in living ability were compared between the two groups before and after the nursing intervention.
Results:The Scores of FSS, MBI and ESS of the observation group were 45.34±8.84, 54.3±4.69 and 45.24±4.18 before intervention and 32.48±5.80, 75.50±4.93, 63.12±3.32 after intervention. The Scores of FSS, MBI and ESS of the control group was 44.97±8.47, 53.47±4.20, 43.48±5.67 before intervention and 39.59±7.43, 63.81±3.25, 55.32±3.48 after intervention. The difference after intervention between the two groups was statistically significant (t values were 15.335, 12.562, 5.843, P<0.01). The difference in the observation group before and after intervention was statistically significant (t values were 9.422, 24.133, 25.945, P<0.01). The differences in the control group before and after intervention was statistically significant (t values were 3.699, 15.082, 13.786, P<0.01).
Conclusions:Health management based on the theory of protection motivation is more effective than routine nursing to improve the fatigue, neurological function and life ability of stroke patients.