Experimental study on the effect of olfactory training on olfactory function in mice with olfactory dysfunction
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2020.02.013
- VernacularTitle: 嗅觉训练对嗅觉障碍小鼠嗅觉功能影响的实验研究
- Author:
Jinhui ZHOU
1
;
Dong XING
;
Hamu MA
;
Yue ZHAO
;
Yahui ZHAO
;
Hongquan WEI
Author Information
1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Olfactory disorders;
Olfactory training;
3-methylindole;
Models, animal
- From:
Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2020;55(2):154-158
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To observe the effect of olfactory training on mice with olfactory dysfunction induced by 3-methylindole (3-MI).
Methods:Thirty-one male BALB/c mice were randomly divided into 3 groups by random digits table: control group (group A, n=10), olfactory dysfunction group (group B, n=10) and olfactory dysfunction+olfactory training group (group C, n=11). Mice in group B and group C were intraperitoneally injected with 150 mg/kg 3-MI to induce olfactory dysfunction model, while mice in group A were intraperitoneally injected with corn oil of the same volume. From the first day after injection, mice in group C were treated with 4 kinds of odors by inhalation, while mice in group B were treated with distilled water by inhalation, with 2 times/d, 30 min/time/kind of odor, and continuous training for 28 d. Group A was not treated. Buried food pellet tests were conducted before injection and at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after injection, respectively. The olfactory epithelium was harvested for observation of the number of olfactory marker protein (OMP) and the thickness of olfactory epithelium on the 28th day after injection. SPSS 23.0 software was used for statistical analysis.
Results:Before injection, all mice in each group had no olfactory dysfunction. At the 7th, 14th, 21st and 28th days after injection, the food finding time of mice in group C was shorter than that in group B, and the difference was statistically significant ((175.88±100.50) s vs (266.73±46.83) s, (132.00±84.62) s vs (264.10±48.50) s, (103.57±77.43) s vs (197.43±69.78) s, (67.79±32.54) s vs (176.63±61.06) s, all P<0.05), but food finding time of mice in group B and C was longer than that in group A (the food finding time of group A at the 7th, 14th, 21st and 28th days after injection was (27.13±5.36) s, (25.83±7.28) s, (23.13±2.72) s, (26.63±7.60) s, respectively, all P<0.05). At the 28th day after olfactory training, the number of OMP positive cells in group B and C were fewer than that in group A, and the difference was statistically significant ((108.00±28.19)/HP vs (288.22±84.06)/HP, (199.33±58.55)/HP vs (288.22±84.06)/HP, all P<0.05). The number of OMP positive cells in group C were higher than that in group B (P<0.05). The number of OMP positive cells had negative correlation with food finding time (r=-0.886, P<0.01). As for the thickness of the olfactory epithelium, the thickness of group B was thinner than that in group A and C, and the difference was statistically significant ((59.57±31.27) μm vs (114.55±40.70)μm vs (90.54±37.72) μm, all P<0.05).
Conclusion:Olfactory training can accelerate the recovery of olfactory function in 3-MI-induced olfactory impaired mice.
