Evaluation and prediction of pelvic dose in postoperative IMRT for cervical cancer
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2020.02.013
- VernacularTitle: 宫颈癌术后IMRT中骨盆受量评估及预测
- Author:
Yanze SUN
1
,
2
,
3
;
Yongqiang YANG
;
Jianjun QIAN
;
Ye TIAN
Author Information
1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
2. Institute of Radiotherapy& Oncology, Soochow University
3. Suzhou Key Laboratory for Radiation Oncology, Suzhou 215004, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Cervical cancer/intensity-modulated radiotherapy;
Pelvis;
Dosimetry
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
2020;29(2):136-140
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate and predict the pelvic dose by analyzing two pelvic contour definitions and identify the influencing factors of the pelvic dose in postoperative IMRT for cervical cancer, aiming to provide reference for postoperative pelvis-sparing IMRT for cervical cancer.
Methods:Sixty cervical cancer patients receiving postoperative IMRT with unrestricted pelvic dose were selected. Two sets of pelvic contours (pelvic anatomy and pelvic Mell) were delineated as per the anatomical and Mell methods. The dose relationship between two methods was analyzed after redesigning the treatment plan by limiting dose of pelvic anatomy. The correlation analysis was performed by Pearson’s correlation method. The factors affecting the pelvic anatomy dose were identified by Logistic multivariate regression analysis and a dose prediction model was subsequently established.
Results:The volumes of pelvic anatomy and pelvic Mell were 925.82 cm3 and 1141.20 cm3(P=0.000). There was a significant correlation between them (r>0.622, P=0.000). The dose of pelvic anatomy was significantly higher than that of pelvic Mell. The relationship of V10, V20 and V30 between them was y=-8+ 1.01x, y=-13+ 1.05x and y=-4+ 0.9x, respectively. The dose limits of pelvic Mell recommended by literatures(V10<90%, V20<75%, V30<60%) were translated into V10<97%, V20<83% and V30<70%, respectively. The pelvic anatomy dose was significantly reduced after dose limiting. The V10, V20, V30 and Dmean were significantly decreased by 3.64%, 12.69%, 12.02% and 6.93%(P=0.000, 0.000, 0.000), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the overlapping volume of pelvic anatomy within PTV was an independent influencing factor of pelvic anatomy dose (P<0.05). Patients with a relative overlapping volume of less than 18% could easily meet the dose limiting requirement.
Conclusions:Both two pelvic contour definitions can be applied in postoperative pelvis-sparing IMRT for cervical cancer. Use of pelvic dose limiting can significantly reduce the IMRT dose. The overlapping volume of the pelvis within PTV is an independent influencing factor of pelvic dose. Patients whose overlapping volume within the PTV relative to pelvis is less than 18% can easily meet the dose limiting requirement.
