Clinical observation on six children of left bundle branch area pacing
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2020.02.008
- VernacularTitle: 儿童左束支区域起搏六例临床观察
- Author:
Chencheng DAI
1
;
Wenlong DAI
2
;
Baojing GUO
1
Author Information
1. Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China
2. Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Cardiac pacing, artificial;
Safety;
Treatment outcome
- From:
Chinese Journal of Pediatrics
2020;58(2):107-112
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the safety and effectiveness of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in children.
Methods:Clinical data, pacing electrocardiogram and parameters of 6 patients (5 females and 1 male) who underwent permanent pacemaker implantation and LBBAP from January to June 2019 in the Department of Pediatric Cardiology of Anzhen Hospital were retrospectively analyzed.
Results:The weight of the 6 patients aged between 9 and 14 years ranged from 26 to 48 kg. Five patients were diagnosed with third degree atrioventricular block, and 1 patient was diagnosed with cardiac dysfunction after right ventricular apical pacing. Cardiac function decreased in one patient and remained normal in the other five patients. Left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) Z score was 1.85±0.65. V1 lead showed changes like right bundle branch block in pacing electrocardiogram. No significant difference was found regarding QRS wave duration ((95±13) ms vs. (111±20) ms, t=-1.610, P>0.05) between preoperation and postoperation. Pacing threshold was (0.85±0.26) V. The sensing threshold was (15.0±4.3) mV and the impedance was (717±72) Ω. P potential was recorded in 3 cases. The earliest left ventricular local activation time was (56±5) ms and remained stable at different output voltages. Postoperative echocardiography revealed that the electrodes were located near the endocardium of the left ventricular septum. No complications such as myocardial perforation and electrode dislocation occurred during follow-up. The pacing threshold, sensing threshold and impedance were (0.60±0.09)V, (16.1±3.9)mV, (662±78)Ω respectively at 3 months after operation. The patient with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovered to normal on the 3 rd day after LBBAP (45% vs. 57%). The LVEDD Z score decreased to (1.1±0.3) at 3 months after operation and was significantly lower than that before operation (t=2.38, P<0.05).
Conclusions:LBBAP in children can achieve narrow QRS pacing andphysiological pacing with stablepacing parameters. It can improve left ventricular enlargement caused by long-term bradycardia, and cardiac dysfunction and cardiac enlargement caused by long-term right ventricular apical pacing quickly and effectively.LBBAP is safe and feasible for older children in the near future. However, the long term potential risks of LBBAP need further observation and study.
