Comparison of the efficacy of two Conbercept regimens in the treatment of polypoid choroidal angiopathy
- VernacularTitle:康柏西普两种给药方案治疗息肉样脉络膜血管病变的疗效比较
- Author:
Zhou-Peng Liao
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: conbercept; polypoid choroidal vasculopathy; best corrected visual acuity; central retinal thickness
- From: International Eye Science 2020;20(3):566-570
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
AIM: To observe the efficacy of two conbercept regimens in the treatment of polypoid choroidal angiopathy.
METHODS: Twenty-one patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy who met the inclusion criteria and were treated in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups. The group A(9 patients and 9 eyes)was treated with 3+Q12W scheme, namely, 0.5mg conbercept ophthalmic injection was intravitreally injected every 4wk for 3 consecutive times, and then 1 time every 12wk. In the group B(12 patients and 12 eyes), 3+TAE scheme was carried out, that is 0.5mg conbercept ophthalmic injection was intravitreally injected every 4wks for 3 consecutive times. The time of next injection was determined according to the evaluation results of each visit. The interval to the next visit/treatment was ≥ 4wk and ≤ 12wk. The best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), central retinal thickness(CRT)and the frequency of injection were compared between the two groups at 12 and 48wk after treatment, respectively.
RESULTS: BCVA of the group A was 74.78±11.23 letters and 74.67±13.94 letters at 12 and 48wk after treatment, which increased by 7.00±4.21 letters and 6.89±4.48 letters at the baseline before treatment, respectively. BCVA in the group B was 77.83±5.46 letters and 77.58±8.59 letters respectively at 12 and 48wk after treatment, which were 8.75±7.54 letters and 8.50±5.60 letters higher than the baseline before treatment. At the 12 and 48wk after injection, the average CRT in the group A was 276.33±44.34μm and 240.56±40.11μm, respectively, which were 43.22±42.21μm and 79.00±53.64μm lower than the baseline before treatment. At the 12 and 48wk after injection, the average CRT in the group B was 271.58±63.08μm and 241.00±43.91 μm, which were 57.42±45.33μm and 88.00±61.16μm lower than the baseline before treatment, respectively. The average times of intravitreal injection of conbercept were 6.00±0.00 and 7.75±1.14 times in the 3+Q12W group and the 3+TAE group, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Two different regimens of conbercept could reduce the CRT and improve the visual acuity of the patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. And the times of intravitreal injection in the 3+Q12W administration group were less than those in the3+TAE administration group.