Application of a new type of nasal feeding device patent technology in patients with severe acute pancreatitis
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2019.10.014
- VernacularTitle: 实用新型鼻饲装置专利技术在急性重症胰腺炎患者中的应用
- Author:
Xiaojin PU
1
;
Shutao YANG
;
Yuanyunzi WANG
;
Juanzhen MA
;
Xin YANG
Author Information
1. Department of General Surgery, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Enteral nutrition;
Pancreatitis;
Controlled clinical trial;
Patents
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2019;35(10):790-794
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical effect of a new type of nasal feeding device and the commonly used nasal feeding device at present.
Methods:From January 2017 to December 2017, 162 cases of acute severe pancreatitis in the General surgery department two in First Hospital of Lanzhou University were treated with enteral nutrition. According to the random number table method, it was divided into experimental group (82 cases) and control group (80 cases). The experimental group used a new nasal feeding device to implement nasogastric nutrition, while the control group used traditional clinical common devices. The evaluation indexes were as follows: comparison of nasal feeding, comfort (abdominal distention), incidence of diarrhea, effect of nasal feeding and convenience of patients' family members.
Results:The number of the evaluation of medical staff was not good, general, good and very good were 3, 3, 27 and 49 cases in the experimental group and 4, 48, 15 and 13 cases in the control group, respectively. There was significant difference between the two groups (Z=-7.14, P=0.00). The number of the evaluation of the patients and their families was not good, general, good and very good were 0, 1, 33 and 48 cases in the experimental group and 34, 31, 11 and 4 cases in the control group, respectively. There were significant differences between the two groups (Z=-7.44, P=0.00). The number of severe abdominal distension, general abdominal distension and no abdominal distension were 22, 42 and 18 cases in the experimental group, 43, 34 and 3 cases in the control group, respectively. There were significant differences between the two groups (Z=-4.14, P=0.00). The number of severe diarrhea, general diarrhea and no diarrhea were 8, 50 and 24 cases in the experimental group, 43, 34 and 3 cases in the control group, respectively. There were significant differences between the two groups (Z=-6.55, P=0.00). The number of inconvenience, general and convenience were 2, 5 and 75 cases in the experimental group, and 18, 43 and 19 cases in the control group, respectively. There was significant difference between the two groups (Z=-8.45, P=0.00).
Conclusions:The new type of nasal feeding device has good performance and safety. The doctor, nurse and patient have good satisfaction, high evaluation, good convenience and suitable for clinical use.
