The comparative study of endoscope versus open surgery on nipple sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction using prosthesis implantation
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2019.10.010
- VernacularTitle: 腔镜与开放的保留乳头乳晕乳腺癌根治切除加一期假体植入乳房重建的对比研究
- Author:
Ye ZHANG
1
;
Ling ZHONG
;
Jing LIU
;
Haoxi LIU
;
Li CHEN
;
Yi ZHANG
;
Linjun FAN
;
Jun JIANG
Author Information
1. Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Breast neoplasms;
Laparoscopy;
Mastectomy, radical;
Mammaplasty
- From:
Chinese Journal of Surgery
2019;57(10):770-775
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy between endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediat reconstruction using prosthesis implantation and open surgery.
Methods:Totally 189 early-stage breast cancer patients admitted at Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University from January 2013 to December 2017 were enrolled. Among them, 104 patients underwent endoscopic nipple sparing mastectomy with immediat reconstruction using prosthesis implantation (endoscopic group), with an age of (41.7±6.1) years (range: 25 to 51 years), and 85 patients underwent traditional open surgery (open group), with an age of (41.6±7.7) years (range: 27 to 65 years). The operative duration, the volume of intraoperative blood loss, the volume of drainage in 3 days after surgery, postoperative complications and patients′ satisfaction of breast reconstruction were compared between the two groups using t test, Mann-Whitney U test, χ2 test or non-parametric test.
Results:There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative complications, the rates of recurrence and overall survival between the two groups (P>0.05). The operative duration (sentinel lymph node biopsy: (178±80) minutes vs. (198±42) minutes, t=-2.082, P=0.039; axillary lymph node dissection: (204±79) minutes vs. (233±49) minutes, t=-2.952, P=0.004), the volume of drainage in three days postoperative ((183±141)ml vs. (237±104) ml, t=-2.938, P=0.004) in the open group were lower than endoscopic group. The volume of intraoperative blood loss in the endoscopic group was lower than that in the open group ((87±64) ml vs. (62±36) ml, t=3.210, P=0.002). Patients′ satisfaction of breast reconstruction in the endoscopic group was higher than that in the open group.
Conclusions:Both endoscopic nipple sparing mastectomy with immediat reconstruction using prosthesis implantation and open surgery are safe in oncology. Endoscopic surgery maybe more suitable alternative in breast reconstruction for early-stage breast cancer patients.
