Expert opinions on optimized treatments of ankle and distal radius fractures in light of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2019.10.008
- VernacularTitle: 加速康复外科理念下踝关节骨折与桡骨远端骨折诊疗方案优化的专家调查
- Author:
Zhijian SUN
1
;
Xu SUN
;
Weitong SUN
;
Zhiqiang GAO
;
Ting LI
;
Xinbao WU
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China
- Publication Type:Clinical Trail
- Keywords:
Questionnaires;
Ankle joint;
Radius;
Enhanced recovery after surgery;
Expert consensus
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
2019;21(10):864-868
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate expert opinions on the recommendations in Expert Consensus on Optimized Treatments of Ankle Fracture in Light of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery and Expert Consensus on Optimized Treatments of Distal Radius Fracture in Light of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery so as to provide a reference for orthopaedic surgeons when they refer to the 2 documents.
Methods:At the symposium in November 2018, all members of Orthopaedic Trauma Committee of Bethune Public Welfare Foundation were interviewed through questionnaires. The questionnaires involved 30 recommendations from the 2 documents concerning optimized perioperative managements. The rates of recommendation and strong recommendation by these experts were calculated about the 30 recommendations from the 2 above documents.
Results:A total of 68 experts from the 89 members of Orthopaedic Trauma Committee of Bethune Public Welfare Foundation finished the questionnaires. Of the 30 recommendations, 26 obtained recommendation from these experts at a rate of above 95%, and 4 recommendation from these experts at a rate from 80% to 90%. The rates of strong recommendation were not high, ranging from 60% to 80% in 26 recommendations and <60% in 4.
Conclusions:The recommendations from the above 2 documents have been highly agreed upon by these experts we investigated but obtained a relatively low rate of strong recommendation. The present investigation may serve as a significant complement for recommendations from the 2 documents of expert consensus and a necessary reference for orthopaedic surgeons.
