Comparison of the clinical effect of a facial-submental artery island flap in reconstruction after resection of oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2020.02.004
- Author:
YUAN Kaifang
1
;
CHEN Weiliang
1
;
ZHOU Bin
1
;
ZHANG Daming
1
Author Information
1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
oral cavity;
oropharynx;
squamous cells;
cancer;
tumor;
operative defect;
facial-submental artery island flap;
pedicle flap;
functional reconstruction;
swallowing function;
speech function;
prognosis
- From:
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
2020;28(2):84-87
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective :To compare the clinical effect of the reconstruction of defects of the surgical area with the facial-submental artery island flap (FSAIF) after resection of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OC-SCC) and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OP-SCC).
Methods:A total of 203 cases of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma and 72 cases of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma were treated with the FSAIFs. The complications and success rate of the two groups were observed. The swallowing and voice functions of the two groups were evaluated and compared 6 months after the operation. The survival of the two groups was followed up.
Results:No significant differences were found in TNM stage, the skin paddle of the flap, the rate of flap failure, or local complications between the OC-SCC and OP-SCC groups (P > 0.05). Significant differences in swallowing and speech outcomes were observed between the groups (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in survival outcome between the groups after 9-59 months of follow-up.
Conclusion:FSAIF can be used for reconstructing the defect in oral cavity or oropharynx, but the swallowing function of reconstructing the defect in oropharynx is poor.
- Full text:面颏下动脉岛状皮瓣在口腔与口咽鳞状细胞癌切除术后重建的临床效果比较.pdf
