Clinical and Radiographic Results of Artificial Disc Replacement Combined with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Two-Level Cervical Disc Disease.
10.4184/jkss.2017.24.4.211
- Author:
Yoon Suk HYUN
1
;
Jun Sik PARK
;
Kyung Won SONG
;
Gab Lae KIM
;
Jin Young LEE
;
Jae Hyuk SHIN
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital-affiliated to Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. jshin2100@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Cervical vertebrae;
Intervertebral disc disease;
Spinal fusion;
Total disc replacement
- MeSH:
Arm;
Case-Control Studies;
Cervical Vertebrae;
Diskectomy*;
Female;
Humans;
Neck;
Neck Pain;
Range of Motion, Articular;
Retrospective Studies;
Spinal Fusion;
Spine;
Total Disc Replacement*
- From:Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2017;24(4):211-220
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a hybrid construct (HC) of cervical artificial disc replacement (CADR) combined with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) (group I) with 2-level ACDF (group II) in patients with 2-level cervical disc disease. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: ACDF is reported to potentially promote degenerative changes in the adjacent segment. CADR has been expected to reduce the risk of adjacent segment degeneration. However, its clinical course has yet to be sufficiently clarified. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients underwent 2-level cervical disc surgery. Single-level CADR combined with ACDF was performed in 14 patients. Twelve patients underwent 2-level ACDF. Clinical profiles were assessed using the neck disability index (NDI) and visual analogue scale scores of arm and neck pain. Dynamic lateral cervical radiographs were obtained preoperatively and at 1, 6, 12, and 18 months postoperatively. The range of motion (ROM) of the overall cervical spine (C2-7) and the adjacent segments was measured. RESULTS: Group I showed superior NDI 18 months postoperatively (p < 0.05). The mean C2-7 ROM of both groups recovered to the preoperative ROM. At 18 months postoperatively, the C2-7 ROM of group I was higher than that of group II (p < 0.05). The superior adjacent segment ROM was higher in group II (p < 0.05), starting at 6 months. The inferior adjacent segment ROM showed no significant difference between the groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The HC group showed comparable clinical and radiographic outcomes to those of the 2-level ACDF group. HC can be used selectively in the treatment of patients with 2-level cervical disc disease.
