Minimally Invasive Surgery without Decompression for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Spinal Metastasis with Epidural Spinal Cord Compression Grade 2
- Author:
Jong Myung JUNG
1
;
Chun Kee CHUNG
;
Chi Heon KIM
;
Seung Heon YANG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Spine; Neoplasm metastasis; Decompression, Surgical; Instrumentation
- MeSH: Back Pain; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Decompression; Decompression, Surgical; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Life Expectancy; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neurologic Manifestations; Operative Time; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Spinal Cord Compression; Spinal Cord; Spine; Walking
- From:Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2019;62(4):467-475
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: OBJECTIVE: There is a lack of knowledge regarding whether decompression is necessary in treating patients with epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC) grade 2. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) without decompression and conventional open surgery (palliative laminectomy) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) spinal metastasis of ESCC grade 2.METHODS: Patients with HCC spinal metastasis requiring surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with ESCC grade 2, medically intractable mechanical back pain, a Nurick grade better than 3, 3–6 months of life expectancy, Tomita score ≥5, and Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score ≥7 were included. Patients with neurological deficits, other systemic illnesses and less than 1 month of life expectancy were excluded. Thirty patients were included in the study, including 17 in the open surgery group (until 2008) and 13 in the MIS group (since 2009).RESULTS: The MIS group had a significantly shorter operative time (94.2±48.2 minutes vs. 162.9±52.3 minutes, p=0.001), less blood loss (140.0±182.9 mL vs. 1534.4±1484.2 mL, p=0.002), and less post-operative intensive care unit transfer (one patient vs. eight patients, p=0.042) than the open surgery group. The visual analogue scale for back pain at 3 months post-operation was significantly improved in the MIS group than in the open surgery group (3.0±1.2 vs. 4.3±1.2, p=0.042). The MIS group had longer ambulation time (183±33 days vs. 166±36 days) and survival time (216±38 days vs. 204±43 days) than the open surgery group without significant difference (p=0.814 and 0.959, respectively).CONCLUSION: MIS without decompression would be a good choice for patients with HCC spinal metastasis of ESCC grade 2, especially those with limited prognosis, mechanical instability and no neurologic deficit.
