Complications Following Transradial Cerebral Angiography : An Ultrasound Follow-Up Study
- Author:
Wonki YOON
1
;
Woo Keun KWON
;
Omar CHOUDHRI
;
Jaegeun AHN
;
Hanyong HUH
;
Choel JI
;
Huy M DO
;
Aditya MANTHA
;
Sin Soo JEUN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Cerebral Angiography; Radial Artery; Ultrasonography
- MeSH: Catheterization; Catheters; Cerebral Angiography; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hyperplasia; Hypertension; Incidence; Male; Radial Artery; Retrospective Studies; Ultrasonography; Ultrasonography, Doppler
- From:Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2018;61(1):51-59
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The feasibility and usefulness of transradial catheterization for coronary and neuro-intervention are well known. However, the anatomical change in the catheterized radial artery (RA) is not well understood. Herein, we present the results of ultrasonographic observation of the RA after routine transradial cerebral angiography (TRCA).METHODS: Patients who underwent routine TRCA with pre- and post-procedure Doppler ultrasonography (DUS) of the catheterized RA were enrolled. We then recorded and retrospectively reviewed the diameter and any complicated features of the RA observed on DUS, and the factors associated with the diameter and complications were analyzed.RESULTS: A total of 223 TRCAs across 181 patients were enrolled in the current study. The mean RA diameter was 2.48 mm and was positively correlated with male gender (p < 0.001) and hypertension (p < 0.002). The median change in diameter after TRCA was less than 0.1 mm (range, -1.3 to 1.2 mm) and 90% of changes were between -0.8 and +0.7 mm. Across 228 procedures, there were 12 cases (5.3%) of intimal hyperplasia and 22 cases (9.6%) of asymptomatic local vascular complications found on DUS. Patients with abnormal findings on the first procedure had a smaller pre-procedural RA diameter than that of patients without findings (2.26 vs. 2.53 mm, p=0.0028). There was no significant difference in the incidence of abnormal findings for the first versus subsequent procedures (p=0.68).CONCLUSION: DUS identified the pre- and post-procedural diameter and local complications of RA. Routine TRCA seems to be acceptable with regard to identifying local complications and changes in RA diameter.
