The Usefulness of the Evaluation of Gastric Residuals in Premature Infants
- Author:
Kyung Min LEE
1
;
Su Jung CHOI
Author Information
1. Registered Nurse, Samsung Medical Center, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Premature birth;
Enteral nutrition;
Gastric residuals;
Feeding intolerance;
Enterocolitis;
Necrotizing
- MeSH:
Enteral Nutrition;
Enterocolitis;
Enterocolitis, Necrotizing;
Humans;
Incidence;
Infant, Newborn;
Infant, Premature;
Intensive Care, Neonatal;
Premature Birth;
Retrospective Studies;
Tertiary Care Centers
- From:
Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing
2019;12(3):74-83
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The routine evaluation of gastric residuals (RGR) is considered standard care for premature infants. This study evaluated the usefulness of RGR in premature infants.METHODS: The study retrospectively investigated 208 premature infants (gestational aged under 34 weeks) who underwent gavage feeding in a neonatal intensive care unit at a tertiary hospital. The patients were divided into two groups: RGR (n=104) and no-RGR (n=104). Those in the no-RGR group had their gastric residuals checked only if signs of feeding intolerance were present. Clinical outcomes, including the time to reach full enteral feeding (FEF) and the incidences of gastrointestinal disorders such as feeding intolerance (FI) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), were compared. Data were analyzed with SPSS ver. 21, using a Mann-Whitney U test, chi-squared test, and Fisher's exact test.RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference for the time to FEF (z=−0.61, p =.541), incidence of FI (χ²=0.38, p =.540), and NEC (χ²=1.42, p =.234) between the two groups.CONCLUSION: No-RGR did not increase the risk for FI or NEC. These results suggest that RGR evaluation may not improve nutritional outcomes in premature infants. Recommendations for further research and practice guidelines will be provided.
