Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Enhances the Expression of Genes Encoding Antioxidant Enzymes and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Related Proteins in Rat Skeletal Muscle.
10.5758/vsi.2016.32.4.141
- Author:
Ui Jun PARK
1
;
Hyoung Tae KIM
;
Won Hyun CHO
;
Jae Hyoung PARK
;
Hye Ra JUNG
;
Min Young KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Ulsan, Korea. parkuijun@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Ischemic preconditioning;
Reperfusion injury;
Muscle;
Skeletal
- MeSH:
Activating Transcription Factor 4;
Animals;
Catalase;
Cats;
Endoplasmic Reticulum*;
Extremities;
Gene Expression;
Glutathione Peroxidase;
Ischemic Preconditioning*;
Methods;
Muscle, Skeletal*;
Placebos;
Rats*;
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction;
Reperfusion Injury;
Superoxide Dismutase
- From:Vascular Specialist International
2016;32(4):141-149
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Ischemic preconditioning (IPC), including remote IPC (rIPC) and direct IPC (dIPC), is a promising method to decrease ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury. This study tested the effect of both rIPC and dIPC on the genes for antioxidant enzymes and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-related proteins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty rats were randomly divided into the control and study groups. In the control group (n=10), the right hind limb was sham-operated. The left hind limb (IscR) of the control group underwent IR injury without IPC. In the study group (n=10), the right hind limb received IR injury after 3 cycles of rIPC. The IscR received IR injury after 3 cycles of dIPC. Gene expression was analyzed by Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction from the anterior tibialis muscle. RESULTS: The expression of the antioxidant enzyme genes including glutathione peroxidase (GPx), superoxide dismutase (SOD) 1 and catalase (CAT) were significantly reduced in IscR compared with sham treatment. In comparison with IscR, rIPC enhanced the expression of GPx, SOD2, and CAT genes. dIPC enhanced the expression of SOD2 and CAT genes. The expression of SOD2 genes was consistently higher in rIPC than in dIPC, but the difference was only significant for SOD2. The expression of genes for ER stress-related proteins tended to be reduced in IscR in comparison with sham treatment. However, the difference was only significant for C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP). In comparison with IscR, rIPC significantly up-regulated activating transcription factor 4 and CHOP, whereas dIPC up-regulated CHOP. CONCLUSION: Both rIPC and dIPC enhanced expression of genes for antioxidant enzymes and ER stress-related proteins.
