The Comparison between FSGS and MCNS Using Proteomic Method in Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome; Preliminary Study.
- Author:
Sung Do KIM
1
;
Byoung Soo CHO
Author Information
1. Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea. kimsungdo@khu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Nephrotic syndrome;
Glomerulosclerosis;
Proteomics;
Glutathione S-transferase
- MeSH:
Biomarkers;
Biopsy;
Dermatoglyphics;
Glutathione Transferase;
Kidney Failure, Chronic;
Nephrotic Syndrome;
Proteomics;
Silver Staining
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Pediatric Nephrology
2009;13(2):170-175
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: FSGS do not respond well to any kind of therapy and gradually progress to end-stage renal disease. This study was conducted to investigate the difference of protein expression between MCNS and FSGS as a preliminary study for understanding the pathophysiology of FSGS. METHODS: Renal biopsy samples of MCNS and FSGS were obtained, which was diagnosed by one pathologist. They were solubilized with a conventional extraction buffer for protein extraction. The solution was applied on immobilized linear gradient strip gel (pH 4-7) using IPGphor system. Silver staining was carried out according to standard method. Protein identification was done by searching NCBI database using MASCOT Peptide Mass Fingerprint software. RESULTS: The differences in protein expressions between MCNS and FSGS were shown by increased or decreased protein spots. Most prominently expressed spot among several spots in FSGS was isolated and analyzed, one of which was glutathione S-transferase (GST) P1-1, whereas it was not found in MCNS. So GSTP1-1 was considered as the one of the key biomarkers in pathogenesis of FSGS. CONCLUSION: This result would be helpful in diagnosing FSGS and researching FSGS. Further studies for glutathione S-transferase P1-1 might be necessary to elucidate the mechanisms regarding FSGS.
