Management of Hydrocephalus in the Medulloblastoma Patients.
- Author:
Jung IL LEE
1
;
Kyu Chang WANG
;
Byung Kyu CHO
Author Information
1. Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Hydrocephalus;
Medulloblastoma;
Ventriculoperitoneal shunt;
External ventricular drainage;
Reservoir
- MeSH:
Catheters;
Drainage;
Hand;
Hematoma;
Humans;
Hydrocephalus*;
Intracranial Pressure;
Medulloblastoma*;
Punctures;
Retrospective Studies;
Risk Factors;
Seoul;
Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt
- From:Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
1993;22(5):650-658
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
In order to identify the risk factors for shunt dependency and to select the optimal treatment modality of hydrocephalus in medulloblastoma patient, fifty two patients with medulloblastoma, who were treated at Seoul National University Hospital from 1982 to 1992, were reviewed. Retrospectively the authors analyzed the types of treatment and the results in the fifty patients of hydrocephalus associated with medulloblastoma. Two cases of perioperative death were excluded from the statistical analysis. The initial management of hydrocephalus in 50 patients included:1) ventriculoperitoneal shunt(VPS) before the removal of tumor in 6, 2) external ventricular drainage(EVD) bfore the removal of tumor in 4, 3) intraoperative ventricular puncture and placement of EVD or internalized reservoir(IVD, internalized ventricular drainage) for continuous or intermittent cerebrospinal fluid(CSF) drainage postoperatively in 29, 4) no procedures of CSF drainage before or during the operation for tumor removal in 11. Among the 44patients in whom preoperative VPS was not inserted, 16 finally required permenent VPS after tumor removal and 28 remained shunt-free. Factors which might predict the need for permanent VPS were analyzed and tested statistically. The presence of symptoms and signs of increased intracranial pressure, the severity of hydrocephalus on computerized tomography(CT), T and M stage, and the type of initial management of hydrocephalus were not statistically significant factors influencing the shunt dependency. The only two statistically significant features predicting the need for a subsequent permanent shunt were:1) incomplete tumor removal(p=0.025) and 2) postoperative hematoma in the fourth ventricle(p=0.004) Among the 11 patients without preoperative or intraoperative EVD, 4 required shunt placement after tumor removal, of which 3needed urgent placement of EVD. Preoperative or intraoperative EVD could have played a role as a safety mechanism in those patients. On the other hand, the preoperative or intraoperative EVD did not enhance the rate of infection or shunt dependency. In the cases of ventricular installations for CSF drainage, simple externalization of ventricular catheter and postoperative continuous CSF drainage(EVD) seemed to be associated with a lower rate of infection compared with the method of postoperative intermittent puncture and drainage through the internalized reservoir(IVD), but the difference of infection rates between the two groups were statistically insignificant(p=0.557). The average duration of CSF drainage in the externalized EVD roup was shorter than that of internalized reservoir group(5.4 versus 10.7 days). In conclusion, 1) the preoperative or intraoperative EVD is useful as a safety mechanism while it dose not enhance the possibilities of shunt dependency and infection, 2) for the patients in whom the placement of subsequent permanent shunt is highly expected, the EVD with the internalized reservoir can be a good choice. An algorithm for the management of hydrocephalus was suggested.
