Feasibility of Linear-Shaped Gastroduodenostomy during the Performance of Totally Robotic Distal Gastrectomy
- Author:
Bo WANG
1
;
Sang Yong SON
;
Hojung SHIN
;
Chul Kyu ROH
;
Hoon HUR
;
Sang Uk HAN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Gastric cancer; Robotic surgical procedure; Gastrectomy; Gastroenterostomy
- MeSH: Bile Reflux; Gastrectomy; Gastroenterostomy; Humans; Laparoscopy; Learning Curve; Length of Stay; Methods; Postoperative Complications; Propensity Score; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Selection Bias; Stomach Neoplasms
- From:Journal of Gastric Cancer 2019;19(4):438-450
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: Although linear-shaped gastroduodenostomy (LSGD) was reported to be a feasible and reliable method of Billroth I anastomosis in patients undergoing totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG), the feasibility of LSGD for patients undergoing totally robotic distal gastrectomy (TRDG) has not been determined. This study compared the feasibility of LSGD in patients undergoing TRDG and TLDG.MATERIALS AND METHODS: ALL C: onsecutive patients who underwent LSGD after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer between January 2009 and December 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to reduce the selection bias between TRDG and TLDG. Short-term outcomes, functional outcomes, learning curve, and risk factors for postoperative complications were analyzed.RESULTS: This analysis included 414 patients, of whom 275 underwent laparoscopy and 139 underwent robotic surgery. PSM analysis showed that operation time was significantly longer (163.5 vs. 132.1 minutes, P<0.001) and postoperative hospital stay significantly shorter (6.2 vs. 7.5 days, P<0.003) in patients who underwent TRDG than in patients who underwent TLDG. Operation time was the independent risk factor for LSGD after intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy. Cumulative sum analysis showed no definitive turning point in the TRDG learning curve. Long-term endoscopic findings revealed similar results in the two groups, but bile reflux at 5 years showed significantly better improvement in the TLDG group than in the TRDG group (P=0.016).CONCLUSIONS: LSGD is feasible in TRDG, with short-term and long-term outcomes comparable to that in TLDG. LSGD may be a good option for intracorporeal Billroth I anastomosis in patients undergoing TRDG.
