Hepatitis B screening rates and reactivation in solid organ malignancy patients undergoing chemotherapy in Southern Thailand
- Author:
Ratchapong LAIWATTHANAPAISAN
1
;
Pimsiri SRIPONGPUN
;
Naichaya CHAMROONKUL
;
Arunee DECHAPHUNKUL
;
Chirawadee SATHITRUANGSAK
;
Siwat SAKDEJAYONT
;
Chanon KONGKAMOL
;
Teerha PIRATVISUTH
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Hepatitis B, Chronic; Virus activation; Chemotherapy; Drug-related side effects and adverse reactions
- MeSH: Asian Continental Ancestry Group; Drug Therapy; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Follow-Up Studies; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Hepatitis; Humans; Liver Function Tests; Mass Screening; Prevalence; Retrospective Studies; Thailand; Virus Activation
- From:Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2019;25(4):366-373
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) following chemotherapy (CMT) is well-known among hematologic malignancies, and screening recommendations are established. However, HBVr data in solid organ malignancy (SOM) patients are limited. This study aims to determine hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) screening rates, HBV prevalence, and the rate of significant hepatitis caused by HBVr in SOM patients undergoing CMT.METHODS: Based on the Oncology unit’s registration database from 2009–2013, we retrospectively reviewed records of all SOM patients ≥18 years undergoing CMT at Songklanagarind Hospital who were followed until death or ≥6 months after CMT sessions. Exclusion criteria included patients without baseline liver function tests (LFTs) and who underwent CMT before the study period. We obtained and analyzed baseline clinical characteristics, HBsAg screening, and LFT data during follow-up.RESULTS: Of 3,231 cases in the database, 810 were eligible. The overall HBsAg screening rate in the 5-year period was 27.7%. Screening rates were low from 2009–2012 (7.8–21%) and increased in 2013 to 82.9%. The prevalence of HBV among screened patients was 7.1%. Of those, 75% underwent prophylactic antiviral therapy. During the 6-month follow-up period, there were three cases of significant hepatitis caused by HBVr (4.2% of all significant hepatitis cases); all were in the unscreened group.CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HBV in SOM patients undergoing CMT in our study was similar to the estimated prevalence in general Thai population, but the screening rate was quite low. Cases of HBVr causing significant hepatitis occurred in the unscreened group; therefore, HBV screening and treatment in SOM patients should be considered in HBV-endemic areas.
