Changes in Language Function and Recovery-Related Prognostic Factors in First-Ever Left Hemispheric Ischemic Stroke
10.5535/arm.2019.43.6.625
- Author:
Kyung Ah KIM
1
;
Jung Soo LEE
;
Won Hyuk CHANG
;
Deog Young KIM
;
Yong Il SHIN
;
Soo Yeon KIM
;
Young Taek KIM
;
Sung Hyun KANG
;
Ji Yoo CHOI
;
Yun Hee KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. yun1225.kim@samsung.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Stroke;
Aphasia;
Prognosis;
Stroke volume;
Rehabilitation
- MeSH:
Age of Onset;
Aphasia;
Brain;
Diffusion;
Education;
Humans;
Mass Screening;
National Institutes of Health (U.S.);
Prognosis;
Rehabilitation;
Stroke Volume;
Stroke
- From:Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
2019;43(6):625-634
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate longitudinal changes in language function in left-hemispheric ischemic stroke patients as well as factors that influence language recovery until 1 year after stroke onset.METHODS: We analyzed data from 235 patients with first-ever left-hemispheric ischemic stroke. All patients completed the Korean version of the Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test (K-FAST) at 7 days (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), and 1 year (T4) after stroke onset. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to investigate changes in language function between time points. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the K-FAST scores at T1. Stroke lesion volume was assessed using diffusion tensor images, and involvement of language-related brain regions was examined. Multiple regression analysis was used to analyze factors influencing improvement of K-FAST score.RESULTS: The K-FAST scores at T1, T2, T3, and T4 differed significantly (p < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, only the severe group showed continuous significant improvement by 1 year. Factors that negatively influenced improvement of language function were the age at onset, initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and initial K-FAST score, whereas education level and stroke lesion volume positively affected recovery. Involvement of language-related brain regions did not significantly influence long-term language recovery after ischemic stroke.CONCLUSION: Recovery of language function varied according to the severity of the initial language deficit. The age at stroke onset, education level, initial severity of aphasia, initial NIHSS score, and total stroke lesion volume were found to be important factors for recovery of language function.
