Effects of Different Bandaging Methods for Treating Patients With Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema
10.5535/arm.2019.43.6.677
- Author:
Se Hyun OH
1
;
Sung Hwan RYU
;
Ho Joong JEONG
;
Jung Hyun LEE
;
Young Joo SIM
Author Information
1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea. oggum@naver.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Lymphedema;
Breast cancer lymphedema;
Bandages
- MeSH:
Arm;
Bandages;
Breast;
Extremities;
Hand;
Humans;
Lymphedema;
Methods;
Prospective Studies;
Quality of Life;
Shoulder
- From:Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
2019;43(6):677-685
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the treatment effects, satisfaction with the treatment, and performance improvement following bandage treatment using the spiral method and spica method for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL).METHODS: A prospective study with 46 patients with BCRL was conducted. All patients were divided into either the spiral or spica group for non-elastic bandage therapy and received the same treatment for 2 weeks, apart from the group-specific bandaging method used. For both groups, the Quality of Life Instrument score before treatment, changes in the volume of lymphedema limb and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score before and after treatment, and treatment satisfaction after treatment were compared. The Student t-test was used to compare the parameters between the two different bandage methods.RESULTS: With respect to the treatment outcomes, total volume reduction and proximal part volume reduction after treatment were 98.0±158.3 mL and 56.0±65.4 mL in the spiral method group and 199.0±125.1 mL and 106.1±82.2 mL in the spica method group, respectively. Therefore, the spica method group showed a significantly better improvement (p < 0.05). The DASH score changes after treatment showed that the spiral group score increased by 3.8±5.4 and the spica group score increased by 7.7±6.1; thus, a significantly better improvement was noted in the spica group (p < 0.05).CONCLUSION: The spica method indicated better volume reduction and DASH score improvement than the spiral method. Therefore, the spica method may be more effective for treating patients with BCRL.
