Feasibility and quality control of robotic sleeve lobectomy and bronchoplasty
- VernacularTitle:机器人肺叶袖式切除成形及支气管成形术的可行性及质量控制
- Author:
WANG Xilong
1
;
XU Shiguang
1
;
LIU Bo
1
;
WU Ziheng
1
;
LIU Deyu
1
;
XU Wei
1
;
WANG Bin
1
;
DING Renquan
1
;
LIU Xingchi
1
;
WANG Shumin
1
Author Information
1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, 110016, P.R.China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Bronchoplasty;
sleeve lobectomy;
minimally invasive;
robotic
- From:
Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2020;27(02):190-194
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the feasibility of robotic sleeve lobectomy and bronchoplasty and to summarize the experience of quality control and technical process management. Methods From January to December 2018, our hospital completed robotic sleeve lobectomy and bronchoplasty for 5 patients, including the upper right lung lobe in 2 patients, the middle right lung lobe in 1 patient and the lower left lung lobe in 2 patients. There were 3 males and 2 females with an age of 56.6 (39-75) years. The surgical approach was the same as the surgical incision of the robotic lobectomy. During the operation, the lobes were separated, all enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes were cleaned, pulmonary hilum was dissected, pulmonary arteriovenous vessels and bronchi were exposed, and pulmonary vessels were treated. After exposing the main bronchi, the bronchi were cut off at the distal end of the lesion, and the lobes where the lesion was located (including lesions) were excised by sleeve type and the bronchi were continuously sutured with 3-0 Prolene from the back wall for anastomosis. After the anastomosis, no air leakage was found in the expanded lung, and the anastomosis was no longer wrapped. Results The operation time was 147.4 (100-192) min, including bronchial anastomosis time 17.6 (14-25) min. Intraoperative blood loss was 60.0 (20-100) mL, and 20 (9-37) lymph nodes were dissected. Three patients had squamous cell carcinoma, 1 adenocarcinoma, and 1 neuroendocrine tumor. All patients showed negative results in the freezing pathology of bronchial stump during operation. All patients recovered well after surgery, without perioperative complications, and the anastomosis was smooth. Postoperative hospital stay was 10.8 (7-14) days. The patients were followed up for 6 to 12 months without anastomotic stenosis or other complications. Conclusion Since the robot system is a special instrument with 3D vision and 7 degrees of freedom for movable joints, the robotic bronchial suture is more flexible and accurate. The robotic sleeve lobectomy and bronchoplasty are safe and feasible.