Discussion and improvement methods of quantitative susceptibility mapping reconstruction.
10.7507/1001-5515.201812014
- Author:
Hongyu GUO
1
,
2
;
Zhongnan YU
3
;
Gaochao MA
1
,
4
;
Chunsheng LI
3
Author Information
1. Institute of Biomedical Electromagnetic Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang 110870, P.R.China
2. Neusoft Medical System, Shenyang 110167, P.R.China.iuhongguo@163.com.
3. Institute of Biomedical Electromagnetic Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang 110870, P.R.China.
4. Neusoft Medical System, Shenyang 110167, P.R.China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
laplacian boundary value;
quantitative susceptibility mapping;
regularization enable of sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data;
sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data;
truncated k-space division
- MeSH:
Algorithms;
Artifacts;
Brain;
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging;
Phantoms, Imaging
- From:
Journal of Biomedical Engineering
2019;36(6):930-937
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
To assess the background field removal method usually used in quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), and to analyze the cause of serious artifacts generated in the truncated -space division (TKD) method, this paper discusses a variety of background field removal methods and proposes an improved method to suppress the artifacts of susceptibility inversion. Firstly, we scanned phase images with the gradient echo sequence and then compared the quality and the speed of reconstructed images of sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data (SHARP), regularization enable of SHARP (RESHARP) and laplacian boundary value (LBV) methods. Secondly, we analyzed the reasons for reconstruction artifacts caused by the multiple truncations and discontinuity of the TKD method, and an improved TKD method was proposed by increasing threshold truncation range and improving data continuity. Finally, the result of susceptibility inversion from the improved and original TKD method was compared. The results show that the reconstruction of SHARP and RESHARP are very fast, but SHARP reconstruction artifacts are serious and the reconstruction precision is not high and implementation of RESHARP is complicated. The reconstruction speed of LBV method is slow, but the detail of the reconstructed image is prominent and the precision is high. In the QSM inversion methods, the reconstruction artifact of the original TKD method is serious, while the improved method obtains good artifact suppression image and good inversion result of artifact regions.
