Relationship between the Retinal Thickness Analyzer and the GDx VCC Scanning Laser Polarimeter, Stratus OCT Optical Coherence Tomograph, and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy.
- Author:
Kyoung Tak MA
1
;
Sang Hyup LEE
;
Samin HONG
;
Kyoung Soo PARK
;
Chan Yun KIM
;
Gong Je SEONG
;
Young Jae HONG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Comparative Study
- Keywords: Glaucoma; Optical coherence tomography; Retinal thickness analyzer; Scanning laser polarimeter
- MeSH: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; *Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle/*diagnosis; Humans; Lasers/diagnostic use; Male; Middle Aged; Ophthalmoscopy; Optic Disk/*pathology; Optic Nerve Diseases/*diagnosis; Retina/*pathology; Retrospective Studies; Tomography, Optical Coherence
- From:Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2008;22(1):10-17
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between the retinal thickness analyzer (RTA) parameters, and those of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter (GDx VCC), Stratus OCT optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT), and Heidelberg retinal tomograph II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (HRT II). METHODS: Twenty-nine primary open-angle glaucoma patients were retrospectively included in this study. Measurements were obtained using the RTA, GDx VCC, Stratus OCT, and HRT II. We calculated the correlation coefficients between the parameters of RTA and those of the other studies. RESULTS: Among the optic disc parameters of RTA, the cup volume was best correlated with Stratus OCT (R=0.780, p<0.001) and HRT II (R=0.896, p<0.001). Among the posterior pole retinal thickness parameters, the posterior pole abnormally thin area (PPAT) of the RTA and the inferior average of the GDx VCC were best correlated (R=-0.596, p=0.001). The PPAT of the RTA and the inferior maximum of the Stratus OCT were best correlated (R=-0.489, p=0.006). The perifoveal minimum thickness (PFMT) of the RTA and the cup shape measurement of the HRT II were best correlated (R=-0.565, p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Many RTA optic disc parameters were significantly correlated with those of the Stratus OCT and HRT II. The RTA posterior pole retinal thickness parameters were significantly correlated with those of the GDx VCC, Stratus OCT and HRT II. The RTA optic disc and posterior pole retinal thickness parameters may be valuable in the diagnosis of glaucoma.
