Clinical effect of endoscopic dense ligation in treatment of esophageal variceal bleeding
10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2018.08.018
- VernacularTitle:内镜下密集套扎法治疗食管静脉曲张破裂出血的效果观察
- Author:
Meilan CUI
1
;
Yansheng JIA
;
Huimin YAN
Author Information
1. Shijiazhuang Fifth Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050021, China
- Publication Type:Research Article
- Keywords:
liver cirrhosis;
esophageal and gastric varices;
ligation;
treatment outcome
- From:
Journal of Clinical Hepatology
2018;34(8):1683-1688
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effect of endoscopic dense ligation in the treatment of esophageal variceal bleeding. MethodsA total of 156 patients who underwent endoscopic ligation for the first time due to esophageal variceal bleeding caused by cirrhotic portal hypertension in Shijiazhuang Fifth Hospital from July 2015 to June 2016 were enrolled, and according to the treatment method, they were divided into dense ligation group with 76 patients and non-dense ligation group with 80 patients. The patients were followed up for 1-2 years, and a statistical analysis was performed for the eradication or disappearance rate of varices, the number of times of ligation, early rebleeding rate, late-onset rebleeding rate, and the incidence rate of adverse reactions. The t-test was used for comparison of continuous data between two groups, and the chi-square test or Fisher′s exact test was used for comparison of categorical data between two groups. ResultsThere were significant differences between the dense ligation group and the non-dense ligation group in the eradication or disappearance rate of varices (71.05% vs 55.00%, χ2=4.300, P=0.038) and number of times of ligation (χ2=8.511, P=0.014), and there were no significant differences between the two groups in early rebleeding rate (5.26% vs 2.50%, P＞0.05), late-onset rebleeding rate (7.89% vs 10.00%, P＞0.05), recurrence rate of varices (13.16% vs 18.75%, P＞0.05), and incidence rate of adverse reactions (26.32% vs 21.25%, P＞0.05). There was a significant difference in the time to recurrence of varices between the two groups (11.90±1.89 months vs 7.07±1.17 months, t=2.295, P=0.031). Of all 156 patients, 2 (1.28%) died during follow-up, with 1 patient in the dense ligation group and 1 in the non-dense ligation group. There was no significant difference in mortality rate between the two groups (P＞0.05). ConclusionEndoscopic dense ligation is a safe technique for the treatment of esophageal variceal bleeding and is better than non-dense ligation in terms of the disappearance rate of varices and number of times of ligation. Endoscopic dense ligation also allows a longer time to recurrence of varices than non-dense ligation.
