Glaucoma Progression Detection by Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurement Using Scanning Laser Polarimetry: Event and Trend Analysis.
10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.174
- Author:
Byung Gil MOON
1
;
Kyung Rim SUNG
;
Jung Woo CHO
;
Sung Yong KANG
;
Sung Cheol YUN
;
Jung Hwa NA
;
Youngrok LEE
;
Michael S KOOK
Author Information
1. Department of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. sungeye@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Comparative Study
- Keywords:
Event analysis;
Glaucoma;
Progression;
Scanning laser polarimetry;
Trend analysis
- MeSH:
Disease Progression;
Female;
Glaucoma/*diagnosis;
Humans;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Retinal Ganglion Cells/*pathology;
Retrospective Studies;
Scanning Laser Polarimetry/*methods;
Severity of Illness Index
- From:Korean Journal of Ophthalmology
2012;26(3):174-181
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of scanning laser polarimetry (SLP, GDx VCC) to measure the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in order to evaluate the progression of glaucoma. METHODS: Test-retest measurement variability was determined in 47 glaucomatous eyes. One eye each from 152 glaucomatous patients with at least 4 years of follow-up was enrolled. Visual field (VF) loss progression was determined by both event analysis (EA, Humphrey guided progression analysis) and trend analysis (TA, linear regression analysis of the visual field index). SLP progression was defined as a reduction of RNFL exceeding the predetermined repeatability coefficient in three consecutive exams, as compared to the baseline measure (EA). The slope of RNFL thickness change over time was determined by linear regression analysis (TA). RESULTS: Twenty-two eyes (14.5%) progressed according to the VF EA, 16 (10.5%) by VF TA, 37 (24.3%) by SLP EA and 19 (12.5%) by SLP TA. Agreement between VF and SLP progression was poor in both EA and TA (VF EA vs. SLP EA, k = 0.110; VF TA vs. SLP TA, k = 0.129). The mean (+/-standard deviation) progression rate of RNFL thickness as measured by SLP TA did not significantly differ between VF EA progressors and non-progressors (-0.224 +/- 0.148 microm/yr vs. -0.218 +/- 0.151 microm/yr, p = 0.874). SLP TA and EA showed similar levels of sensitivity when VF progression was considered as the reference standard. CONCLUSIONS: RNFL thickness as measurement by SLP was shown to be capable of detecting glaucoma progression. Both EA and TA of SLP showed poor agreement with VF outcomes in detecting glaucoma progression.
