Reliability and Validity of the Measurement for Assessing Resourcefulness.
10.4040/jkan.1998.28.2.244
- Author:
Soon Rim SUH
1
;
Eun Ok LEE
;
Won Gi LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Nursing, Kyungpook National University, Korea. rich@healthis.org
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Resourcefulness;
Reliability;
Validity
- MeSH:
Adult;
Faculty, Nursing;
Female;
Humans;
Korea;
Psychology;
Reproducibility of Results*;
Social Desirability;
Weights and Measures
- From:
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
1998;28(2):244-255
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to verify the reliability and validity of the Rosenbaum self-control schedule(SCS) for assessing resourcefulness in Korea and to explore the simplified scale. The study subjects consisted of 787 adults in a community. The data was collected during the period from Oct. to Dec., 1995 and analyzed as Cronbach alpha item correlation with total, Perarson correlation and factor analysis with varimax rotation using SAS. Results were as follows : The mean SCS score for this sample was 17.2 and there were statistical differences for gender(men, 13.1 ; women, 20.0) on the SCS scores. The cronbach alpha of SCS with 36 items was .74 and when simplified with 30 items, it's coefficient alpha was .78. The translated content of the SCS was validated by two nursing faculty members and one professor of psychology. Factor analysis revealed the most parsimonious structure was obtained when six factors were extracted and subsequently rotated via the varimax criterion. There was 40.2% of total communality variance in the SCS with 36 items. The total communality variance was slightly increased to 43.4% with 30 items of the SCS. In order to reduce from 36 items to 30 items, the process excepted 6 items having low item correlation with total and low MSA(means of sampling adequacy) of factor analysis. According to factor analysis, there are six factors such as emotion control, impulse control, self-efficacy, coping with problems, pain control and satisfaction control. The SCS was found to have low, but statistically significant, correlations with social desirability and helplessness. From the above results, it can be concluded that the reliability of the SCS(inherent and simplified) was a acceptable level and its validity was reasonable when comparing it with other validity studies. To determine the usefulness the simplified scale, further study is necessary to simultaneously compare and analyze both scales for stability.
