Sulfur dioxide limit standard and residues in Chinese medicinal materials.
10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20171023.002
- Author:
Chuan-Zhi KANG
1
;
Wan-Zhen YANG
1
;
Ge MO
2
;
Li ZHOU
1
;
Jing-Yi JIANG
1
;
Chao-Geng LV
1
;
Sheng WANG
1
;
Tao ZHOU
3
;
Ye YANG
4
;
Lan-Ping GUO
1
Author Information
1. State Key Laboratory and Breeding Base of Dao-di Herbs, National Resource Center for Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
2. Tibetan Traditional Medical College, Lhasa 850000, China.
3. Guiyang College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang 550025, China.
4. Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
limit standard;
quality;
suggestion;
sulfur dioxide residue;
sulfur fumigation
- MeSH:
Drugs, Chinese Herbal;
standards;
Fumigation;
Medicine, Chinese Traditional;
Sulfur;
Sulfur Dioxide;
standards
- From:
China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica
2018;43(2):242-247
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
The traditional sulfur fumigation processing method has been widely used in the initial processing and storage of traditional Chinese medicinal materials due to its economy, efficiency, convenience, high operability and effect on mold and insect prevention. However, excessive sulfur fumigation of traditional Chinese medicinal materials would lead to the changes in chemical compositions, and even endanger human health. This study showed that traditional Chinese medicinal materials were sulfur fumigated directly after being harvested for quick drying, or fumigated after being weted in the storage process for preventing mold and insects. We found that the sulfur dioxide limits for traditional Chinese medicinal materials were stricter than those for foods. Based on the existing limit standards, we obtained the data of sulfur dioxide residues for 35 types of traditional Chinese medicinal materials in a total of 862 batches. According to the limit standard in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia (150， 400 mg·kg⁻¹), the average over-standard rate of sulfur dioxide was as high as 52.43%, but it was reduced to 29.47% if calculated based on the limit for vegetable additive standard (500 mg·kg⁻¹). Sulfur fumigation issue shall be considered correctly: sulfur dioxide is a type of low toxic substance and less dangerous than aflatoxin and other highly toxic substances, and a small amount of residue would not increase the toxicity of traditional Chinese medicinal materials. However, sulfur fumigation might change the content of chemical substances and affect the quality of traditional Chinese medicinal materials. Furthermore, the exposure hazards of toxic substances are comprehensively correlated with exposure cycle, exposure frequency, and application method. In conclusion, it is suggested to strengthen the studies on the limit standard of traditional Chinese medicinal materials, formulate practical and feasible limit standard for sulfur dioxide residues in traditional Chinese medicinal materials that are consistent with the medication characteristics of traditional Chinese medicinal materials and can guarantee people's demand for safe medication.
