Meta analysis of unilateral condylar replacement and high tibial osteotomy in the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee.
10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.12.017
- Author:
You-Wei FU
;
Bing-Gen LIU
;
Jian LUO
;
Ming-Xing LUO
;
Qing-Jiang PANG
1
,
2
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopaedics, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo 315010, Zhejiang, China
2. Pqjey@sina.com.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Meta-analysis;
Osteoarthritis, knee;
Osteotomy;
Tibia
- MeSH:
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee;
Humans;
Knee Joint;
Osteoarthritis, Knee;
Osteotomy;
Tibia;
surgery;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2018;31(12):1156-1163
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:Meta-analysis was used to compare the clinical efficacy of high tibial osteotomy(HTO) and unicondylar arthroplasty (UKA) in the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis (MIOA) and provide a better surgical choice for patients with MIOA.
METHODS:The Cochrane Library (Issue 6, 2017), PubMed, Ovid, ELSIVE, CNKI and Wanfang databases were searched by a computer. Literatures on HTO and UKA for MIOA from January 1, 1970 to June 30, 2017, including complications, knee joint score, knee mobility, revision rate and excellent and good rate, were searched and screened out according to the inclusion criteria, and strict quality evaluation was carried out. RevMan 5.0 software provided by Cochrane collaboration network was used to conduct the meta-analysis of the included research results and to test the heterogeneity of the data.
RESULTS:Total 13 articles met the inclusion criteria, and the total sample size was 1 043. Among them, 462 were HTO treatment group and 581 were UKA treatment group. By comparison between HTO treatment group and UKA treatment group, there were significant differences in the contralateral deterioration rate[WMD=3.21, 95%CI(1.13, 9.10)], pre-operative knee range of motion[WMD=6.55, 95%CI(1.44, 11.66)], Lysholm knee score[WMD=-3.15, 95%CI(-4.77, -1.53)], complications[WMD=2.78, 95%CI(1.52, 5.11], revision rate[WMD=1.81, 95%CI(1.17, 2.80)], the rate of excellent and good[WMD=0.49, 95%CI(0.30, 0.80)], and femorotibial angle changes[WMD=-2.37, 95%CI, (-3.63, -1.11)](<0.05). There were no significant differences between the HTO treatment group and the UKA treatment group in patellofemoral deterioration rate[WMD=1.59, 95%CI(0.65, 3.84)] and the free walking speed[WMD=-0.02, 95%CI(-0.09, 0.04)](>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS:Based on the limited data, high tibial osteotomy is a better choice for the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis in the comparison of short and medium-term clinical outcomes, and long-term clinical outcomes may need further study.
