Different mini skin flaps in repairing finger soft tissue with bone defect.
10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.01.012
- Author:
Wei-Bin DU
1
;
Li-Xiang WANG
2
,
3
;
Feng SHEN
1
;
Lin-Ru ZENG
1
;
Dang WU
1
;
Guo-Ming WU
1
;
Liang XU
1
Author Information
1. Jiangnan Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University of Chinese Medicine, Xiaoshan TCM Hospital, Hangzhou 311201, Zhejiang, China.
2. Jiangnan Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University of Chinese Medicine, Xiaoshan TCM Hospital, Hangzhou 311201, Zhejiang, China
3. dwbbdm@163.com.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Finger phalanges;
Soft tissue injuries;
Surgical flaps
- MeSH:
Adult;
Female;
Finger Injuries;
Humans;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures;
Skin;
Skin Transplantation;
Soft Tissue Injuries;
Treatment Outcome;
Young Adult
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2019;32(1):56-59
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To explore surgical methods and clinical effects of three different types of mini skin flap transplantation for repairing finger soft tissue with bone defect.
METHODS:Thirty-three patients with finger soft tissue or bone defect were treated from December 2014 to October 2016, including 24 males and 9 females aged from 21 to 52 years old with an average of (36.42±5.70) years old, and soft tissue defect area ranged from 1.3 cm×1.8 cm to 2.3 cm×4.2 cm. According to damage degree, nature and patients' options, 15 finger of 15 cases were adopted retrograde dorsal metacarpal artery perforators fascia flap, 10 fingers of 9 cases were treated with free foot artery descending branch wrist skin flap, 9 fingers of 9 cases were treated with free the second toe details phalanges compound flap. Survival rate, postoperative complications and finger function assessed by Dargan functional criteria at the latest follow up were observed.
RESULTS:All flaps were survived, both of donor site and recipient site were without deep infected. The donor site of one patient occurred necrotic, and the distal donor site of one patient occurred surface necrotic, then healed by active dressing change. All patients were followed up from 6 to 16 months with an average of(8.34±1.28) months. Two points of finger recognition were restored between 8 and 12 mm with an average of (8.84±0.43) mm, and the appearance, texture and sensory functions of skin flap were restored. No obvious complications were observed on the donor site. According to Dargan function evaluation of finger joints, 18 patients got excellent results, 14 moderate and 1 good.
CONCLUSIONS:Three kinds of mini skin flap could receive good results in repairing soft tissue of finger or bone defect. Reverse dorsal metacarpal artery perforator fascia flap is not necessary with anastomosing blood vessels and has advantages of safe, simple and high survival rate. Descending branch of superior cutaneous branch of free ulnar artery could cut multiple other perforator flaps simultaneously, and the scar is small and hidden. Dissociated the second toe combined metatarsal phalangeal flap could repair shape and function of finger to the maximum extent and donor site is hidden.
