PFNA and InterTAN intramedullary nailing in elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures: a Meta analysis.
10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.02.006
- Author:
Chen YU
1
;
Long-Hai JIANG
1
;
Da-Wei CAI
1
;
Ji WU
1
;
Jian QIN
2
,
3
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopaedic, Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, China.
2. Department of Orthopaedic, Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, China
3. qinjian@njmu.edu.cn.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Femur;
Fracture fixation, internal;
Hip fractures;
Meta analysis
- MeSH:
Aged;
Bone Nails;
Femoral Fractures;
surgery;
Fracture Fixation, Internal;
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary;
Humans;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2019;32(2):120-129
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of proximal femoral nail antirotation(PFNA) vs InterTAN nail in treating the elderly intertrochanteric femoral fractures.
METHODS:Data of the randomized controlled trials(RCTs) about PFNA vs InterTAN for the treatment of the elderly intertrochanteric femoral fractures were searched in as the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, Wanfang, CNKI, CBM and VIP from their establishment to January 2018 for collecting. After study selection, assessment and data extraction conducted by two reviewers independently, meta-analyses were performed by using the RevMan 5.3 sofware. The level of evidence was assessed by using the GRADEpro system.
RESULTS:Twelve studies involving 1 015 patients were included. The results of meta, analyses showed that: (1)safety indicator: compared with the InterTAN, PFNA had shorter operation time, and less intraoperative bleeding. But InterTAN had less total postoperative complications and internal fixation failure, but there was no significant difference in the operative incision lengths, fracture healing time and other postoperative complications. (2)efficacy indicator: compared with the InterTAN, the Harris hip score was lower after 3 months, but Harris hip score had no significant difference between the two groups after 6, 12 months. Based on GRADEpro system, all the evidence was at level C and weak recommendation(2C).
CONCLUSIONS:The current evidence indicates that PFNA had a similar effect compared with the InterTAN. But InterTAN could provide better stability against rotation and axial pressure effect, can allow patients do functional exercise early such as ambulation to recovery the hip function. It also had less total postoperative complications and internal fixation failure for the poor quality of the original studies and the limited number of studies, a prudent choice is suggested and more high-quality, large-sample studies are need.
