Adverse health effects of asbestos: solving mysteries regarding asbestos carcinogenicity based on follow-up survey of a Chinese factory.
10.1186/s12199-018-0726-z
- Author:
Eiji YANO
1
Author Information
1. Teikyo University Graduate School of Public Health, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8605, Japan. eyano33@gmail.com.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Amphibole asbestos;
Asbestos;
China;
Chrysotile asbestos;
Epidemiology;
Fiber measurement;
Lung cancer;
Tremolite
- MeSH:
Asbestos;
classification;
toxicity;
Asbestos, Amphibole;
toxicity;
Asbestos, Serpentine;
toxicity;
Carcinogens;
China;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Lung Neoplasms;
chemically induced;
epidemiology;
Manufacturing and Industrial Facilities;
statistics & numerical data;
Mining;
statistics & numerical data;
Occupational Diseases;
epidemiology;
Occupational Exposure;
adverse effects;
Textiles;
Tobacco Smoking;
epidemiology
- From:Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
2018;23(1):35-35
- CountryJapan
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
The present review summarizes the results of several follow-up studies assessing an asbestos product manufacturing plant in Chongqing, China, and discusses three controversial issues related to the carcinogenicity of asbestos. The first issue is the amphibole hypothesis, which asserts that the carcinogenicity of asbestos is limited to amphiboles, such as crocidolite, but not serpentines, such as chrysotile. However, considering the possible multiple component of asbestos carcinogenicity in the presence of tobacco smoke or other carcinogens, chrysotile cannot be regarded as non-carcinogenic. Additionally, in a practical sense, it is not possible to assume "pure" chrysotile due to its ubiquitous contamination with tremolite, which is a type of amphibole. Thus, as the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) assessed, all forms of asbestos including chrysotile should be regarded carcinogenic to humans (Group 1). The second issue is the chrysotile/tremolite paradox, which is a phenomenon involving predominant levels of tremolite in the lung tissues of individuals who worked in locations with negligible levels of tremolite due to the exclusive use of chrysotile. Four possible mechanisms to explain this paradox have been proposed but this phenomenon does not support the claim that amphibole is inert. The final issue discussed is the textile mystery, i.e., the higher incidence of cancer in asbestos textile plants compared to asbestos mines where the same asbestos was produced and the exposure levels were comparable. This phenomenon was first reported in North America followed by UK and then in the present observations from China. Previously, levels of fiber exposure were calculated using a universal converting coefficient to estimate the mass concentration versus fiber concentration. However, parallel measurements of fiber and mass concentrations in the workplace and exposed air indicated that there are wide variations in the fiber/mass ratio, which unjustifies the universal conversion. It is possible that contamination by airborne non-fibrous particles in mines with mass fiber conversion led to the overestimation of fiber concentrations and resulted in the textile mystery. Although the use and manufacturing of asbestos has been banned in Japan, more than 10 million tons of asbestos had been imported and the majority remains in existing buildings. Thus, efforts to control asbestos exposure should be continued.
