Differences in symptoms and pre-hospital delay among acute myocardial infarction patients according to ST-segment elevation on electrocardiogram: an analysis of China Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) registry.
10.1097/CM9.0000000000000122
- Author:
Rui FU
1
;
Chen-Xi SONG
;
Ke-Fei DOU
;
Jin-Gang YANG
;
Hai-Yan XU
;
Xiao-Jin GAO
;
Qian-Qian LIU
;
Han XU
;
Yue-Jin YANG
Author Information
1. Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Aged;
Arrhythmias, Cardiac;
pathology;
physiopathology;
China;
Electrocardiography;
methods;
Female;
Hospital Mortality;
Humans;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Myocardial Infarction;
pathology;
physiopathology;
Odds Ratio;
Registries;
Risk Factors;
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction;
pathology;
physiopathology
- From:
Chinese Medical Journal
2019;132(5):519-524
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:Approximately 70% patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) presented without ST-segment elevation on electrocardiogram. Patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) often presented with atypical symptoms, which may be related to pre-hospital delay and increased risk of mortality. However, up to date few studies reported detailed symptomatology of NSTEMI, particularly among Asian patients. The objective of this study was to describe and compare symptoms and presenting characteristics of NSTEMI vs. STEMI patients.
METHODS:We enrolled 21,994 patients diagnosed with AMI from China Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) Registry between January 2013 and September 2014. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to ST-segment elevation: ST-segment elevation (STEMI) group and NSTEMI group. We extracted data on patients' characteristics and detailed symptomatology and compared these variables between two groups.
RESULTS:Compared with patients with STEMI (N = 16,315), those with NSTEMI (N = 5679) were older, more often females and more often have comorbidities. Patients with NSTEMI were less likely to present with persistent chest pain (54.3% vs. 71.4%), diaphoresis (48.6% vs. 70.0%), radiation pain (26.4% vs. 33.8%), and more likely to have chest distress (42.4% vs. 38.3%) than STEMI patients (all P < 0.0001). Patients with NSTEMI were also had longer time to hospital. In multivariable analysis, NSTEMI was independent predictor of presentation without chest pain (odds ratio: 1.974, 95% confidence interval: 1.849-2.107).
CONCLUSIONS:Patients with NSTEMI were more likely to present with chest distress and pre-hospital patient delay compared with patients with STEMI. It is necessary for both clinicians and patients to learn more about atypical symptoms of NSTEMI in order to rapidly recognize myocardial infarction.
TRIAL REGISTRATION:www.clinicaltrials.gov (No. NCT01874691).
