Application of double-pouch anastomosis in laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer assisted by small incision.
- Author:
Xiaolan YOU
1
;
Jian WU
2
;
Yuanjie WANG
3
;
Xiaojun ZHAO
1
;
Yan ZHOU
4
;
Wenqi LI
5
;
Ning XV
1
;
Zhiyi CHENG
1
;
Chuanjiang HUANG
1
;
Guiyuan LIU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tai Zhou People's HospitaL, Jiangsu Taizhou225300, China.
2. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tai Zhou People's HospitaL, Jiangsu Taizhou225300, China, Email: wujian621211@sina.com.
3. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tai Zhou People's HospitaL, Jiangsu Taizhou225300, China, Email: yxl7609@126.com.
4. Department of Scientific research and teaching, Tai Zhou People's HospitaL, Jiangsu Taizhou225300, China.
5. Department of Medical Quality and Safety, Tai Zhou People's HospitaL, Jiangsu Taizhou 225300,China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Anastomosis, Surgical;
standards;
Humans;
Laparoscopy;
Rectal Neoplasms;
surgery;
Retrospective Studies;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
2018;21(12):1408-1413
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To explore the feasibility, safety and the economical efficiency of double-pouch anastomosis in laparoscopic radical rectal cancer assisted by small incisions.
METHODS:Clinical data of 224 patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery at Taizhou People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province from January 2011 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Indusion criteria: patients were diagnosed as primary rectal adenocarcinoma by preoperative enteroscopy pathology, the distance of the tumor to anal margin was from 4 to 15 cm, and patients were treated with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision(TME) through small incision. Patients were divided into two groups according to different anastomosis method, double-pouch group(108 cases) and single-pouch group (116 cases). The surgical indexes, tumor safety indexes, short-term efficacy and economic indexes were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS:There was no significant difference between two groups in baseline data, operative time, blood loss, number of lymph nodes dissection, average length of proximal and distal bowel, or incidence of urination and sexual dysfunction (all P>0.05). Compared with the single-pouch group, the double-pouch group presented lower anastomotic secondary bleeding rate [0.9%(1/108) vs. 6.0% (7/116), χ²=4.238, P=0.040], lower incidence of anastomotic leakage[1.9%(2/108) vs. 7.8%(9/116), χ²=4.179, P=0.041], lower incidence of anastomotic stricture [1.9% (2/108) vs. 8.6% (10/116), χ²=5.054, P=0.025], shorter hospital stay [(13.4±3.9) days vs. (15.9±9.8) days, t=2.524, P=0.013] and less average hospitalization costs [(34 000±7 000) yuan vs. (46 000±23 000) yuan, t=5.047,P<0.001]. There was no significant difference in local recurrence, distant metastasis or overall survival between the two groups during mean follow-up of 33 months (all P>0.05).
CONCLUSION:Laparoscopic TME assisted by small incision with double-pouch anastomosis is a safe, feasible and economical method.
