Intra-Individual, Inter-Vendor Comparison of Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging of Upper Abdominal Organs at 3.0 Tesla with an Emphasis on the Value of Normalization with the Spleen.
10.3348/kjr.2016.17.2.209
- Author:
Ji Soo SONG
1
;
Seung Bae HWANG
;
Gyung Ho CHUNG
;
Gong Yong JIN
Author Information
1. Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju 54907, Korea. pichgo@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Diffusion-weighted imaging;
Apparent diffusion coefficient;
3.0 T;
Inter-vendor differences
- MeSH:
Aged;
*Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging;
Echo-Planar Imaging;
Female;
Humans;
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted;
Kidney/*radiography;
Liver/*radiography;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Pancreas/*radiography;
Prospective Studies;
Spleen/*radiography
- From:Korean Journal of Radiology
2016;17(2):209-217
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of upper abdominal organs with 2 different 3.0 tesla MR systems and to investigate the usefulness of normalization using the spleen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients were enrolled in this prospective study, of which, 35 patients (M:F, 27:8; mean age ± standard deviation, 62.3 ± 12.3 years) were finally analyzed. In addition to the routine liver MR protocol, single-shot spin-echo echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging using b values of 0, 50, 400, and 800 s/mm2 in 2 different MR systems was performed. ADC values of the liver, spleen, pancreas, kidney and liver lesion (if present) were measured and analyzed. ADC values of the spleen were used for normalization. The Pearson correlation, Spearman correlation, paired sample t test, Wilcoxon signed rank test and Bland-Altman method were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: For all anatomical regions and liver lesions, both non-normalized and normalized ADC values from 2 different MR systems showed significant correlations (r = 0.5196-0.8488). Non-normalized ADC values of both MR systems differed significantly in all anatomical regions and liver lesions (p < 0.001). However, the normalized ADC of all anatomical regions and liver lesions did not differ significantly (p = 0.065-0.661), with significantly lower coefficient of variance than that of non-normalized ADC (p < 0.009). CONCLUSION: Normalization of the abdominal ADC values using the spleen as a reference organ reduces differences between different MR systems, and could facilitate consistent use of ADC as an imaging biomarker for multi-center or longitudinal studies.
