Long-Term Survival Analysis of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
10.4055/jkoa.2019.54.5.427
- Author:
Cheol Hee PARK
1
;
Ho Jin LEE
;
Hyuck Sung SON
;
Dae Kyung BAE
;
Sang Jun SONG
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Korea. tesstore@empas.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
knee;
arthroplasty;
unicompartmental;
survival
- MeSH:
Arthroplasty;
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee;
Body Mass Index;
Diagnosis;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Knee;
Methods;
Prostheses and Implants;
Range of Motion, Articular;
Survival Analysis;
Survival Rate
- From:The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
2019;54(5):427-434
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the long term clinical and radiographic results and the survival rates of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). In addition, the factors affecting the survival of the procedure were analyzed and the survival curve was compared according to the affecting factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-nine cases of UKA performed between December 1982 and January 1996 were involved: 10 cases with Modular II, 44 cases with Microloc, and 45 cases with Allegretto prostheses. The mean follow-up period was 16.5 years. Clinically, the hospital for special surgery (HSS) scoring system and the range of motion (ROM) were evaluated. Radiographically, the femorotibial angle (FTA) was measured. The survival rate was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox regression analysis was used to identify the factors affecting the survival according to age, sex, body mass index, preoperative diagnosis, and type of implant. The Kaplan–Meier survival curves were compared according to the factors affecting the survival of UKA. RESULTS: The overall average HSS score and ROM was 57.7 and 134.3° preoperatively, 92.7 and 138.4° at 1 year postoperatively, and 79.1 and 138.4° at the last follow-up (p<0.001, respectively). The overall average FTA was varus 0.8° preoperatively, valgus 4.1° at postoperative 2 weeks, and valgus 3.0° at the last follow-up. The overall 5-, 10-, 15- and 20-year survival rates were 91.8%, 82.9%, 71.0%, and 67.0%, respectively. The factors affecting the survival were the age and type of implant. The risk of the failure decreased with age (hazard ratio=0.933). The Microloc group was more hazardous than the other prostheses (hazard ratio=0.202, 0.430, respectively). The survival curve in the patients below 60 years of age was significantly lower than those of the patients over 60 years of age (p=0.003); the survival curve of the Microloc group was lower compared to the Modular II and Allegretto groups (p=0.025). CONCLUSION: The long-term clinical and radiographic results and survival of UKA using old fixed bearing prostheses were satisfactory. The selection of appropriate patient and prosthesis will be important for the long term survival of the UKA procedure.
