Comparative Study of Compliance for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis (American College of Chest Physicians Guideline and American College of Orthopedic Surgeons Guideline) in High Risk Patients with a Venous Thromboembolism
10.4055/jkoa.2019.54.4.317
- Author:
You Sung SUH
1
;
Jae Hwi NHO
;
Byung Woong JANG
;
Deokwon KANG
;
Sung Hun WON
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea. orthowon@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Comparative Study
- Keywords:
compliance;
venous thromboembolism;
guideline;
orthopedic procedure
- MeSH:
Arthroplasty;
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee;
Compliance;
Hip Joint;
Humans;
Joints;
Medical Records;
Orthopedic Procedures;
Orthopedics;
Retrospective Studies;
Surgeons;
Thorax;
Thromboembolism;
Venous Thromboembolism
- From:The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
2019;54(4):317-326
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To compare and analyze the rate of prevention of two venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guidelines in patients with artificial joint arthroplasty and hip joint fracture. Proper prophylaxis for preventing thromboembolism in orthopedic surgery is significant because of this fetal complication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compared and retrospective analyzed the rate of prevention using the medical records and radiographs of patients who underwent orthopedic surgery from March 2009 to February 2011 according to the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines and from March 2012 to February 2014 according to the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) guidelines. RESULTS: The guidelines for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis have been applied to patients with artificial joint replacement and hip joint fracture, the compliance rate of the ACCP guidelines was 56.0% before surgery, 67.0% after surgery with chemical prophylaxis, and 80.5% with mechanical prophylaxis. In addition, the compliance rate of the AAOS guidelines was 74.1% with chemical prophylaxis, and 88.3% with mechanical prophylaxis, which was higher than the ACCP guidelines. The compliance rates of mechanical and chemical prophylaxis before and after surgery of the ACCP guidelines, and the compliance rate of mechanical and chemical prophylaxis of the AAOS guidelines were compared and analyzed. The results revealed statistical significance (p<0.05) before and after total knee replacement arthroplasty and hip joint fracture internal fixation and total high risk orthopedic surgery. CONCLUSION: Raising the compliance rate of prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in high risk orthopedic surgery is necessary and people should follow the guidelines for a unified direction depending on which situation they are in.
