Comparative Study between Uncemented Proximal Filling Stem and Distal Filling Stem: A retrospective matched-pair study
10.4055/jkoa.1994.29.2.556
- Author:
Yong Ho KIM
;
Jae Ik YOO
;
Chang Uk CHOI
- Publication Type:Comparative Study
- Keywords:
Harris-Galante stem;
Anatomic stem;
Total hip arthroplasty;
Uncemented
- MeSH:
Arthroplasty;
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip;
Bone Resorption;
Buttocks;
Groin;
Head;
Hip;
Incidence;
Necrosis;
Osteolysis;
Retrospective Studies;
Thigh
- From:The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
1994;29(2):556-566
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The authors performed a retrospective matched-pair study for 54 uncemented total hip arthroplasties which were performed in management of avascular necrosis of femoral head from July, 1989 to May, 1991 to investigate what kind of stem is better between Anatomic stem as a proximal filling stem and Harris-Galante stem as a distal filling stem. The results were as followings: 1. Clinical results of Anatomic group were slightly better than those of Harris-Galante group in terms of incidence of thigh pain, groin or buttock pain and final functional score of hip. 2. Incidence of radiolucency around femoral stem in Harris-Galante group was higher than that in Anatomic group, especially in zone I, V of anteroposterior view and in zone IV of lateral view, which were statistically significant(p < 0.05). 3. The incidence of vertical subsidence of femoral stem in Harris-Galante group was significantly higher than that in Anatomic group(p < 0.05) and the average distance of subsidence was 3.2mm. 4. The incidence of endosteal osteolysis and bone resorption in Harris-Galante group was higher than that in Anatomic group. 5. In overall view, clinical and radiographic results of Anatomic group were better than those of Harris-Galante group.
