Treatment for the Extensor Tendon Injury
10.4055/jkoa.1990.25.3.824
- Author:
Moon Sang CHUNG
;
Kang Sup YOON
;
Sung Il BIN
;
Dae Geun JEON
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Extensor tendon;
Injury
- MeSH:
Cicatrix;
Fingers;
Follow-Up Studies;
Glass;
Humans;
Joints;
Prognosis;
Splints;
Tendon Injuries;
Tendon Transfer;
Tendons;
Transplants;
Wrist
- From:The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
1990;25(3):824-832
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Injuries to extensor tendons can be as serious as those of digital flexors. These injuries require accurate approximation, appropirate splinting and careful mobilization. Scarring which always occurs following injury can provoke greater problems in digital extensor injuries than in flexor tendons. The loss of 2mm of excursion of extensor tendon at level of the proximal interphalangeal joint may results in a 50 percent loss of motion of the finger. A special problem associated with extensor tendon healing is loss of gliding. This study was carried was carried out to evaluate the results of the extensor injuries according to their etiology, location and type of treatment. Seventy six lesions in fifty patients treated for extensor tendon injuries were analysed for the comparison of the results of specific treatment. The follow up was from 1 to 3 years with average of 19 months. Following results were obtained. l. Among 50 patients, 16 cases (32%) were acute and 34 cases (68%) were chronic. 2. The etiology were crushing in 19 cases (30%), knife or glass in 20 cases (40%), and avulsion in 8 cases (16%) etc. 3. Mallet finger were observed in 14 tendons, buttonhole in 10 tendons. Nine tendons were injured at the metacarpophalangeal level and 16 tendons were injured at wrist level. 4. Percentage of satisfactory result which means less than 15 degrees of extension loss were 68.1 % in primary repair and plication, and 30.7% in tendon transfer or graft. 5. Prognosis was better when the lesion was proximal to MP joint, and results were more favorable in primary repair and plication than tendon transfer graft.
