The Treatment of Gynecomastia using XPS(R) Microresector (Shaver).
- Author:
Jea Yong SONG
1
;
Byung Kee HAN
;
Chung Hun KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Plastic and Reconstruction Surgery, School of Medicine, Cha University, Gyeonggi-do, Korea. stone82@freechal.com
- Publication Type:Case Report
- Keywords:
XPS(R) microresector (Shaver);
Gynecomastia
- MeSH:
Breast;
Cicatrix;
Contracture;
Gynecomastia;
Hematoma;
Humans;
Lipectomy;
Male;
Mastectomy, Subcutaneous;
Necrosis;
Stress, Psychological;
Subcutaneous Tissue
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
2009;36(6):806-810
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Gynecomastia is an abnormal increase in the volume of the male breast. Subcutaneous mastectomy was the first surgical treatment for gynecomastia. But because of the complications such as nerve injury and scar formation, subcutaneous mastectomy has been substituted with liposuction. Recently various techniques including ultrasound-assisted liposuction has been used for treatment of gynecomastia. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of XPS(R) microresector (Shaver) for treatment of gynecomastia. METHODS: 17 patients, 33 breasts of gynecomastia, Simon grade I or II have been treated with XPS(R) microresector (Shaver). The mean age was 24.5. The subcutaneous tissue and glandular tissue were removed with XPS(R) microresector (Shaver). The operation time, the weight of removed tissue and patients' satisfaction score were accessed. RESULTS: The mean operation time was 78.2 minutes. The mean weight of removed tissue was 113.8 g. There were no significant complications such as necrosis, hematoma, infection or scar contracture. Patients' satisfactory score of scar, shape and confidence were 8.4, 8.2 and 8.4 respectively. As the average score was 8.3, most of the patients were satisfied with their breasts. CONCLUSION: The authors have treated 17 patients suffering from gynecomastia with XPS(R) microresector (Shaver). We obtained short operation time, early recovery, minimal operative scar and less complications with XPS(R) microresector (Shaver) for the treatment of gynecomastia, and patients were satisfied with the results of our method. We concluded that XPS(R) microresector (Shaver) is an alternative option for the treatment of gynecomastia.
