Difference of Clinical Characteristics between Hospital-acquired Hypernatremia and Hypernatremia on Admission.
- Author:
Hyung Do CHO
1
;
Ji Hoon KIM
;
Sang Woong HAN
;
Ho Jung KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Korea. kimhj@hanyang.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Hypernatremia;
Hospital-acquired;
Rate of correction
- MeSH:
Adult;
Cerebral Infarction;
Craniocerebral Trauma;
Dehydration;
Diuresis;
Diuretics;
Hemorrhage;
Humans;
Hypernatremia*;
Mortality;
Renal Insufficiency;
Sodium
- From:Electrolytes & Blood Pressure
2005;3(2):97-101
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Hypernatremia in adults is a common problem that has been associated with mortality rates ranging from 40% to 60%. Clinical characteristics of hospital-acquired hypernatremia have not been well defined. To evaluate the difference between hypernatremia on admission and hospital-acquired hypernatremia, we reviewed 50 patients with hypernatremia at Hanyang University Guri Hospital for 51-month period from 1 March 2001 to 31 May 2005. We defined hypernatremia as serum sodium concentration more than or equal to 150 mEq/L. Hospital-acquired hypernatremia was more frequently (62%) observed than hypernatremia on admission (38%). Patients with hypernatremia on admission (73.1+/-11.7 years) were older than those with hospital-acquired hypernatremia (59.3+/-13.7 years). Only 30% of patients was alert in mental status. Fifty six percent of all patients (n=50) had neurologic problem such as head injury, cerebral infarction or hemorrhage. Admission hypernatremia was caused by severe dehydration due to no access to water. Seventy seven percent of hospital-acquired hypernatremic patients were associated with diuretics and solute diuresis. Treatments of hospital-acquired hypernatremia were also delayed and inadequate. Rate of correction in 6, 12, 24 hours after peak sodium level was not different between hypernatremia on admission and hospital-acquired hypernatremia. More rapid correction during 6 hours in hypernatremia on admission was associated with higher mortality (survival 2.1+/-0.7 mEq/L, death 7.1+/-4.9 mEq/L, p<0.05). Higher mortality was observed in patients with more severe renal insufficiency. In conclusion, hospital-acquired hypernatremia is largely avoidable by clinical attention and appropriate therapy. Patients with cerebrovascular events or renal insufficiency, patients treated with diuretics or hypertonic solute need careful fluid management and the close monitoring of blood sodium level. Particularly, the rate of correction during the first 6 hours should be also managed very cautiously in hypernatermia on admission.
