A Clinical Study on the Cervical Spine Injuries
10.4055/jkoa.1980.15.1.18
- Author:
Nam Hyun KIM
;
In Hee CHUNG
;
Kwan Jae YOU
;
Hun Jae LEE
;
Young Soo KIM
- Publication Type:Original Article
- MeSH:
Accidental Falls;
Age Distribution;
Anti-Bacterial Agents;
Clinical Study;
Early Ambulation;
Emergencies;
Female;
Humans;
Laminectomy;
Male;
Nursing Care;
Paralysis;
Rehabilitation;
Spinal Fusion;
Spine
- From:The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
1980;15(1):18-29
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
With the development of spinal fusion and internal fixation, rehabilitation mediclne, urinary control and antibiotics, the outlook for patients with cervical spine injuries has brightened considerably, as compared with half a century ago. However, splnal cord injury still remains as one of the most devastating accidents that man can Incur and still survive. There is increasing tendency to stabllize unstable cervical spine injuries surglcally for the benefit of early mobilization,.early rehabilitation, easy nursing care, and rigid stability of the spine. A clinical study was performed on 72 patients with 76 fractures and fracture-dislocatlons of the cervical spine, who were hospitalized and treated at Severance Hospital during the period between January 1970 and December 1978 and the following results were obtained. 1. The prevalent age distribution was between 30 and 50 years of age (59.7%), and the ratio between males and females was 5:1. The most common cause of injury was falling from a height (51.4%). 2. In overall patients, neurologic damage was found at first examination in 69.4%, and among these, complete paralysis below the injured level In 41.7%, incomplete paralysis in 25%, and nerve root injury in 2.7%. 3. The mechanisms of injury included flexion-rotation (50%), extension-distraction (18%), flexion-compression (12.5%), pure flexion (5.5%), axial compression (5.5%), and unclassified (8.3%). 4. Among 72 patients, emergency decompressive laminectomy was performed on 10 patients, anterior interbody fusion on 15 patients, posterior fusion with wiring on 3 patients and the rest of patients were treated conservatively. 5. There was no significant difference in the recovery of neurologic loss between conservatively and surgically treated patients, but it was thought better to stabilize the unstable fracture-dislocations surgically for early mobilization and rehabllitatlon.
