Simplified nonsurgical treatment of peri-implantitis using chlorhexidine and minocycline hydrochloride
10.5051/jpis.2018.48.5.326
- Author:
SunJin HEO
1
;
Hyun Joo KIM
;
Ji Young JOO
;
Juyoun LEE
;
Sung Jo KIM
;
Jeomil CHOI
Author Information
1. Department of Periodontology, Pusan National University Dental Hospital, Dental Research Institute, Yangsan, Korea. jrapa@pusan.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Anti-bacterial agents;
Bone regeneration;
Dental implants;
Peri-implantitis
- MeSH:
Anti-Bacterial Agents;
Bone Regeneration;
Chlorhexidine;
Dental Implants;
Hemorrhage;
Humans;
Minocycline;
Peri-Implantitis;
Shoulder
- From:Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science
2018;48(5):326-333
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The present study investigated the outcomes of a newly-developed, simple, and practical nonsurgical treatment modality suitable for most forms of intrabony defects around failing dental implants using intrasulcular delivery of chlorhexidine solution and minocycline hydrochloride (HCl). METHODS: Forty-five dental implants in 20 patients diagnosed with peri-implantitis were included. At baseline and the study endpoint, the probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and the presence of bleeding on probing (BOP) at 6 sites around each implant were recorded. The radiographic osseous defect morphology at the mesial or distal proximal aspect of each implant was classified as 1) narrow or wide and 2) shallow or deep. For a comparative analysis of bone changes according to the defect morphology, the distance from the implant shoulder to the most coronal bone-to-implant contact point (DIB) at the mesial and distal aspects of each implant was measured at baseline and the endpoint. Patients were scheduled to visit the clinic every 2–4 weeks for intrasulcular irrigation of chlorhexidine and delivery of minocycline HCl. RESULTS: We observed statistically significant decreases in PPD, CAL, and BOP after treatment. At the endpoint, bone levels increased in all defects, regardless of the osseous morphology of the intrabony defect. The mean DIB change in deep defects was significantly greater than that in shallow defects. Although the mean bone gain in narrow defects was greater than in wide defects, the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that significant and sustainable improvements in both clinical and radiographic parameters can be expected when intrabony defects around dental implants are managed through a simple nonsurgical approach involving combined intrasulcular chlorhexidine irrigation and local delivery of minocycline HCl.
