The effects of ozone therapy as an adjunct to the surgical treatment of peri-implantitis
10.5051/jpis.2018.48.3.136
- Author:
Sila Cagri ISLER
1
;
Berrin UNSAL
;
Fatma SOYSAL
;
Gonen OZCAN
;
Elif PEKER
;
Inci Rana KARACA
Author Information
1. Department of Periodontology, Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey. silaisler@gazi.edu.tr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Decontamination;
Heterografts;
Ozone;
Peri-implantitis
- MeSH:
Decontamination;
Female;
Follow-Up Studies;
Heterografts;
Humans;
Male;
Ozone;
Peri-Implantitis;
Periodontal Index
- From:Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science
2018;48(3):136-151
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The decontamination procedure is a challenging aspect of surgical regenerative therapy (SRT) of peri-implantitis that affects its success. The purpose of the present study was to determine the impact of additional topical gaseous ozone therapy on the decontamination of implant surfaces in SRT of peri-implantitis. METHODS: A total of 41 patients (22 males, 19 females; mean age, 53.55±8.98 years) with moderate or advanced peri-implantitis were randomly allocated to the test group (ozone group) with the use of sterile saline with additional ozone therapy or the control group with sterile saline alone for decontamination of the implant surfaces in SRT of peri-implantitis. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated over a period of 12 months. RESULTS: At the 12-month follow-up, the plaque and gingival index values were significantly better in the ozone group (P < 0.05). Probing depth decreased from 6.27±1.42 mm and 5.73±1.11 mm at baseline to 2.75±0.7 mm and 3.34±0.85 mm at the end of the 12-month observation period in the ozone and control groups, respectively. Similarly, the clinical attachment level values changed from 6.39±1.23 mm and 5.89±1.23 mm at baseline to 3.23±1.24 mm and 3.91±1.36 mm at the 12-month follow-up in the ozone and control groups, respectively. According to the radiographic evidence, the defect fill between baseline and 12 months postoperatively was 2.32±1.28 mm in the ozone group and 1.17±0.77 mm in the control group, which was a statistically significant between-group difference (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Implant surface decontamination with the additional use of ozone therapy in SRT of peri-implantitis showed clinically and radiographically significant. Trial registry at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03018795.
