Five-fold Gastrointestinal Electrical Stimulation With Electromyography-based Activity Analysis: Towards Multilocular Theranostic Intestinal Implants
- Author:
Jonas F SCHIEMER
1
;
Axel HEIMANN
;
Karin H SOMERLIK-FUCHS
;
Roman RUFF
;
Klaus Peter HOFFMANN
;
Jan BAUMGART
;
Manfred BERRES
;
Hauke LANG
;
Werner KNEIST
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Electric stimulation; Electromyography; Gastrointestinal tract
- MeSH: Colon; Duodenum; Electric Stimulation; Electrodes; Electromyography; Gastrointestinal Tract; Hot Temperature; Ileum; Jejunum; Needles; Stomach; Theranostic Nanomedicine
- From:Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2019;25(3):461-470
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: BACKGROUND/AIMS: Motility disorders are common and may affect the entire gastrointestinal (GI) tract but current treatment is limited. Multilocular sensing of GI electrical activity and variable electrical stimulation (ES) is a promising option. The aim of our study is to investigate the effects of adjustable ES on poststimulatory spike activities in 5 GI segments. METHODS: Six acute porcine experiments were performed with direct ES by 4 ES parameter sets (30 seconds, 25 mA, 500 microseconds or 1000 microseconds, 30 Hz or 130 Hz) applied through subserosal electrodes in the stomach, duodenum, ileum, jejunum, and colon. Multi-channel electromyography of baseline and post-stimulatory GI electrical activity were recorded for 3 minutes with hook needle and hook-wire electrodes. Spike activities were algorithmically calculated, visualized in a heat map, and tested for significance by Poisson analysis. RESULTS: Post-stimulatory spike activities were markedly increased in the stomach (7 of 24 test results), duodenum (8 of 24), jejunum (23 of 24), ileum (18 of 24), and colon (5 of 24). ES parameter analysis revealed that 80.0% of the GI parts (all but duodenum) required a pulse width of 1000 microseconds, and 60.0% (all but jejunum and colon) required 130 Hz frequency for maximum spike activity. Five reaction patterns were distinguished, with 30.0% earlier responses (type I), 42.5% later or mixed type responses (type II, III, and X), and 27.5% non-significant responses (type 0). CONCLUSIONS: Multilocular ES with variable ES parameters is feasible and may significantly modulate GI electrical activity. Automated electromyography analysis revealed complex reaction patterns in the 5 examined GI segments.
