Comparative Analysis of Phase Lag Entropy and Bispectral Index as Anesthetic Depth Indicators in Patients Undergoing Thyroid Surgery with Nerve Integrity Monitoring
10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e151
- Author:
Kwon Hui SEO
1
;
Kyung Mi KIM
;
Soo Kyung LEE
;
Hyunji JOHN
;
Junsuck LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea. sumsonyo@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
General Anesthesia;
Propofol;
Consciousness Monitors;
Entropy;
Electroencephalography
- MeSH:
Anesthesia;
Anesthesia, General;
Bias (Epidemiology);
Consciousness;
Consciousness Monitors;
Electroencephalography;
Entropy;
Humans;
Information Services;
Propofol;
Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve;
Subcutaneous Tissue;
Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System;
Thyroid Gland
- From:Journal of Korean Medical Science
2019;34(20):e151-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Most depth of anesthesia (DOA) monitors rely on the temporal characteristics of a single-channel electroencephalogram (EEG) and cannot provide spatial or connectivity information. Phase lag entropy (PLE) reflects DOA by calculating diverse connectivity from temporal patterns of phase relationships. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of PLE and bispectral index (BIS) monitors for assessing DOA during anesthesia induction, nerve integrity monitoring (NIM), and anesthesia emergence. METHODS: Thirty-five patients undergoing elective thyroid surgery with recurrent laryngeal nerve NIM received propofol and remifentanil via target-controlled infusion. After applying PLE and BIS monitors, propofol infusion was initiated at a calculated effect site concentration (Ce) of 2 µg/mL and then increased in 1-µg/mL Ce increments. After propofol Ce reached 5 μg/mL, a remifentanil infusion was begun, and anesthesia induction was considered complete. During NIM, PLE and BIS values were compared at a specific time points from platysma muscle exposure to subcutaneous tissue closure. PLE and BIS values were recorded continuously from preanesthetic state to full recovery of orientation; bias and limits of agreement between monitors were calculated. RESULTS: PLE and BIS values decreased progressively with increasing propofol Ce during anesthetic induction and increased by stages during emergence. The prediction probabilities of PLE and BIS for detecting propofol Ce changes were 0.750 and 0.756, respectively, during induction and 0.749 and 0.746, respectively, during emergence. No aberrant PLE or BIS values occurred during NIM. Correlation coefficients for BIS and PLE were 0.98 and 0.92 during induction and emergence, respectively. PLE values were significantly higher than BIS values at full recovery of orientation. Estimated bias between monitors was −4.16 ± 8.7, and 95% limits of agreement were −21.21 to 12.89. CONCLUSION: PLE is a reasonable alternative to BIS for evaluating consciousness and DOA during general anesthesia and during NIM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0003490
